Originally posted by BlasterBates
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "German car firms were meant to make sure we got a good Brexit deal. What happened?"
Collapse
-
Jaguar Landrover manufacturing moves to EU
The country's biggest carmaker said the “fluctuating” global market has triggered the decision to temporarily close down its Solihull plant from October 22, sparking a furious response from UK politicians amid the Slovakian investment.
The closure comes off the back of plans to shift all production of JLR’s Discovery model to Slovakia from the West Midlands site, and a fall in demand for diesel cars amid concern over emissions.
But don't worry nothing to do with Brexit purely coincidential.
Anyone who believes there will be a car industry in the UK after a no deal Brexit is in cuckoo land.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostIs it your contention, that the UK RnD team are effectively 'designing' outdated designs, since they are apparently using existing 3/4 cyclinder engines which you suggest should be scrapped?
They are working on improvements, but no drastic improvements have been made yet.
Perhaps you or the other poster would like to demonstrate that the UK R&D team have made drastic improvements to the car design, rather than trying to claim something that is not there.
Originally posted by Bean View PostIs it not possible to redesign current engines, to make them more efficient, powerful and/or cheaper etc.?
Originally posted by Bean View PostWhat are the technical comparisons of the two engine versions and more crucially, have you seen that data?
(I'm certainly not in a position to say one or the other is more powerful, efficient, etc. - are you?)
The performance version of the same engine gets as far as 160bhp and uses an interesting 7 speed dual clutch box that bears a marked resemblance to the VW DQ200.
The 1.6L (which they describe as "sporty) manages 120bhp through a Toyota box
They use a 1.4L engine in their small cars, but it's a rebranded GM one.
But there is one interesting engine which I'd love to see more details on, that's the 2.0L TGDI, a turbo and supercharged direct injection model putting out 230bhp. They don't put it in any of their cars, only in the SUVs. They're proud of that engine, and the fact that it was designed and developed in China.
Originally posted by Bean View PostI think what is more interesting will be the chargepoint rollout required to ensure coverage, generating the leccy to use them and finally, the massive loss of fuel taxes to the governments of the day.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post...
Please, please refrain from posting childish insults...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostSo you are informing us all that powertrain design, as you stated, does not significantly improving the design of Changan cars.
Please, please refrain from posting childish insults. It does nothing to add to the discussion and debate. Or I may have to knock you teeth so far down your throat you'll have to shove a toothbush up your a*se to clean them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostGood point, well made.
Drastic improvement from the powertrain team would be things like scrapping all existing engines to replace them with drastically more efficient/powerful engines.
Is it your contention, that the UK RnD team are effectively 'designing' outdated designs, since they are apparently using existing 3/4 cyclinder engines which you suggest should be scrapped?
Is it not possible to redesign current engines, to make them more efficient, powerful and/or cheaper etc.?
What are the technical comparisons of the two engine versions and more crucially, have you seen that data?
(I'm certainly not in a position to say one or the other is more powerful, efficient, etc. - are you?)
I think what is more interesting will be the chargepoint rollout required to ensure coverage, generating the leccy to use them and finally, the massive loss of fuel taxes to the governments of the day.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View Post2% of the team are working on powertrain design. That means the engine.
98% are working on other areas of research and development outside of powertrain design. These include body shell, transmission, suspension, steering, brakes, electrical, interior design.
I'm not assuming the work is relatively evenly spread, I am stating that 2% of the R&D team are working on the engines.
Yorkie was of the opinion that I had no idea what R&D was going on in the UK for this particular company, but he also believed that the UK R&D team was "drastically improving" the design of the cars.
The UK R&D team works with other teams internationally to develop the overall design of the cars. As yet the UK team has not come out with any drastic improvements - they're still using the 3 and 4 cylinder engines although they may get better designs through in the future as their chief designer is ex-Cosworth. It will be interesting to see the plans going forward and how much they go for in-house design of hybrid and electric engines, how much they leverage their associations with Ford, Isuzu, Mazda, PSA and Suzuki.
Drastic improvement from the powertrain team would be things like scrapping all existing engines to replace them with drastically more efficient/powerful engines.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: