Reply to: Verhofstadt: Brexit is a failure of the EU

[Eirikur]

To be fair, I also see you as a spotty teenager in his room. May not be the case, but that is how you come across. Very immature postings that would be at home coming from the keyboard of a bored teenager trying to troll adults. Incidentally Shaun comes across exactly the same, which is interesting as you both continue to support Brexid despite all the facts that it will make Britain, and many Brits, worse off.

If Bean is not a Gammon as he claims, he must be a spotty helpdesk 1st line support "contractor" at £100 per day and well inside IR35, not that it makes any difference at that rate

[vetran]

Here's what Verhofstadt said:

yay bargaining!


https://grief.com/the-five-stages-of-grief/

[BR14]

To be fair, I also see you as a spotty teenager in his room. May not be the case, but that is how you come across. Very immature postings that would be at home coming from the keyboard of a bored teenager trying to troll adults. Incidentally Shaun comes across exactly the same, which is interesting as you both continue to support Brexid despite all the facts that it will make Britain, and many Brits, worse off.

Nothing to add, here. it all appears to have been eloquently stated

and not just by warty

[Whorty]

Is that how you perceive me from my posts here, since you've never met me?

Interesting, but wrong, again.

I wonder what others (who have seen more of your posts over the years) perceive you as?

To be fair, I also see you as a spotty teenager in his room. May not be the case, but that is how you come across. Very immature postings that would be at home coming from the keyboard of a bored teenager trying to troll adults. Incidentally Shaun comes across exactly the same, which is interesting as you both continue to support Brexid despite all the facts that it will make Britain, and many Brits, worse off.

[Whorty]

sadguru never actually explicitly stated whether he meant CSEs to mock me, or whether he missed off the 'G' - is was your assertion, that he meant to say CSE all along.

I might be right, until he specifies otherwise - or are you claiming you are a sadguru socky and therefore you know?

FFS you really are a dullard idiot. A typical Brexidiot, even when the facts are constantly against you proving you are wrong you just can not admit it, instead trying to blame anyone and everyone else for your own shortcomings.

[Old Greg]

Irrelevant & meaningless.
YOU need to prove that I said that explicitly, otherwise you're a hypocrite for decrying similar actions by others. Quite simple really.



As we know, statements often don't bear relation to reality, so this is irrelevant misdirection again.

As you are direct quoting, I need to have explicitly stated it, truth of the statement is irrelevant.



A search of all forums reveals no results for that combination of words and user, ergo, it is false and now you've read this message - it is intentionally false to leave it as it is.


HTH BIDI

1 You have not proven that I put the statement in my signature. I am not the only person with the rights to update my signature.

2 A search of the forum proves that there is no current post with those words. It does not prove that the original post was not edited or deleted.

We will get to 3 when you have passed 1 and 2.

I don't need to prove anything. You are the one who called me a liar.

[Bean]

By appearance, he's just a socially awkward teenager.

Is that how you perceive me from my posts here, since you've never met me?

Interesting, but wrong, again.

I wonder what others (who have seen more of your posts over the years) perceive you as?

[Bean]

1. Prove that I made the statement in my signature.

Irrelevant & meaningless.
YOU need to prove that I said that explicitly, otherwise you're a hypocrite for decrying similar actions by others. Quite simple really.

2. Prove that the statement is false.

As we know, statements often don't bear relation to reality, so this is irrelevant misdirection again.

As you are direct quoting, I need to have explicitly stated it, truth of the statement is irrelevant.

3. Prove that the statement is intentionally false.

A search of all forums reveals no results for that combination of words and user, ergo, it is false and now you've read this message - it is intentionally false to leave it as it is.


HTH BIDI

[Old Greg]

You mean he's a politician or the worst of the worst, politician and columnist (pretend journalist) in a 'Daily MSM' rag

By appearance, he's just a socially awkward teenager.

[darmstadt]

Give it up. He's a self-confessed liar.

You mean he's a politician or the worst of the worst, politician and columnist (pretend journalist) in a 'Daily MSM' rag

[Old Greg]

That I explicitly stated your signature at some point.

Can you link me to the post where I state the cretin part, specifically?

I'm not fussed and not reporting your sig, as I find your rank hypocrisy very amusing, ya little snowflake

1. Prove that I made the statement in my signature.
2. Prove that the statement is false.
3. Prove that the statement is intentionally false.

[Bean]

Show me the lie I have told.

That I explicitly stated your signature at some point.

Can you link me to the post where I state the cretin part, specifically?

I'm not fussed and not reporting your sig, as I find your rank hypocrisy very amusing, ya little snowflake

[Old Greg]

I'm a self-confessed mistake maker.

Not all mistakes are lies.

For instance, I should have paraphrased (as it was implicit) instead of directly quoting (explicit).

Now, your signature, for instance is directly quoting something I've never explicitly said - so are you a liar too - or is there just a double standard?

Show me the lie I have told.

[Bean]

Give it up. He's a self-confessed liar.

I'm a self-confessed mistake maker.

Not all mistakes are lies.

For instance, I should have paraphrased (as it was implicit) instead of directly quoting (explicit).

Now, your signature, for instance is directly quoting something I've never explicitly said - so are you a liar too - or is there just a double standard?

[Bean]

Let's see, maybe it's your decision to claim someone else said it, when they factually did not.



...So you are putting your words into their mouth.

Yes, and later I accepted your point and stated my question was redundant, effectively retracting that 'claim'...

You have previously not explicitly answered the question of whether someone should correct their mistakes (post editing), or leave them be - so for now, I leave it be, since in the past, you view correcting mistakes as a negative (can't win eh?)

A mistake is not always equal to a lie, although it sounds like there is no middle ground for you on this topic of; mistakes, incorrect assertions, retractions etc...