Verhofstadt: Brexit is a failure of the EU

[Old Greg]

Let's see, maybe it's your decision to claim someone else said it, when they factually did not.



...So you are putting your words into their mouth.

Give it up. He's a self-confessed liar.

[Bean]

The case is closed, but you have to earn the right to have your questions answered. And you can only do so by admitting you were wrong.

sadguru never actually explicitly stated whether he meant CSEs to mock me, or whether he missed off the 'G' - is was your assertion, that he meant to say CSE all along.

I might be right, until he specifies otherwise - or are you claiming you are a sadguru socky and therefore you know?

[Bean]

Let's see, maybe it's your decision to claim someone else said it, when they factually did not.



...So you are putting your words into their mouth.

Yes, and later I accepted your point and stated my question was redundant, effectively retracting that 'claim'...

You have previously not explicitly answered the question of whether someone should correct their mistakes (post editing), or leave them be - so for now, I leave it be, since in the past, you view correcting mistakes as a negative (can't win eh?)

A mistake is not always equal to a lie, although it sounds like there is no middle ground for you on this topic of; mistakes, incorrect assertions, retractions etc...

[Bean]

Give it up. He's a self-confessed liar.

I'm a self-confessed mistake maker.

Not all mistakes are lies.

For instance, I should have paraphrased (as it was implicit) instead of directly quoting (explicit).

Now, your signature, for instance is directly quoting something I've never explicitly said - so are you a liar too - or is there just a double standard?

[Old Greg]

I'm a self-confessed mistake maker.

Not all mistakes are lies.

For instance, I should have paraphrased (as it was implicit) instead of directly quoting (explicit).

Now, your signature, for instance is directly quoting something I've never explicitly said - so are you a liar too - or is there just a double standard?

Show me the lie I have told.

[Bean]

Show me the lie I have told.

That I explicitly stated your signature at some point.

Can you link me to the post where I state the cretin part, specifically?

I'm not fussed and not reporting your sig, as I find your rank hypocrisy very amusing, ya little snowflake

[Old Greg]

That I explicitly stated your signature at some point.

Can you link me to the post where I state the cretin part, specifically?

I'm not fussed and not reporting your sig, as I find your rank hypocrisy very amusing, ya little snowflake

1. Prove that I made the statement in my signature.
2. Prove that the statement is false.
3. Prove that the statement is intentionally false.

[darmstadt]

Give it up. He's a self-confessed liar.

You mean he's a politician or the worst of the worst, politician and columnist (pretend journalist) in a 'Daily MSM' rag

[Old Greg]

You mean he's a politician or the worst of the worst, politician and columnist (pretend journalist) in a 'Daily MSM' rag

By appearance, he's just a socially awkward teenager.

[Bean]

1. Prove that I made the statement in my signature.

Irrelevant & meaningless.
YOU need to prove that I said that explicitly, otherwise you're a hypocrite for decrying similar actions by others. Quite simple really.

2. Prove that the statement is false.

As we know, statements often don't bear relation to reality, so this is irrelevant misdirection again.

As you are direct quoting, I need to have explicitly stated it, truth of the statement is irrelevant.

3. Prove that the statement is intentionally false.

A search of all forums reveals no results for that combination of words and user, ergo, it is false and now you've read this message - it is intentionally false to leave it as it is.


HTH BIDI