• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK politicians vs unelected bureaucrats"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    stop talking sense, you are in the wrong forum for that.
    Yes, you need to go over to the Daily Mail comments section for that

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Because making the deal look like it's going to favour the EU will make whatever deal we do eventually get to look good in comparison. And on the EU side they are trying to impress 27 member states with their tough negotiating skills to keep them onside. Bread and circuses...

    Meanwhile, in the real world, a pragmatic and mutually beneficial deal is the most likely outcome. A bit like the ones they've already achieved over some key supposedly intractable issues like mutual citizen protections and the Irish border.
    stop talking sense, you are in the wrong forum for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Indeed. I have wondered why the government does not feed more information to the papers.

    Even the express seems to post pro-EU stories.
    Because making the deal look like it's going to favour the EU will make whatever deal we do eventually get to look good in comparison. And on the EU side they are trying to impress 27 member states with their tough negotiating skills to keep them onside. Bread and circuses...

    Meanwhile, in the real world, a pragmatic and mutually beneficial deal is the most likely outcome. A bit like the ones they've already achieved over some key supposedly intractable issues like mutual citizen protections and the Irish border.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Most of what is in the papers is sourced from the EU side.
    Indeed. I have wondered why the government does not feed more information to the papers.

    Even the express seems to post pro-EU stories.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Plenty of messenger-shooting going on, but nothing of substance about the actual message.

    If even half of what Adonis says about our civil service is true, the likelihood of a) a good deal b) on time to avoid WTO, is looking more and more remote.

    Perhaps your ire would be better directed towards Davis, Fox, Johnson, etc than Adonis.
    So attack the people who do know what's happening as opposed to a peripheral Quango apparatchik with a dodgy history in a failed government. Yeah, good plan.

    Most of what is in the papers is sourced from the EU side. Clearly it is not going to be supportive of a good deal for the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Are hardcore leavers any better?
    Indeed not. They are one and the same, as I’ve said many times.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    I think it’s a reasonable observation that hardcore Remainers have no capacity for critical self-reflection. They are politically and emotionally retarded. Like National Front thickos, one might say.
    Are hardcore leavers any better?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Plenty of messenger-shooting going on, but nothing of substance about the actual message.

    If even half of what Adonis says about our civil service is true, the likelihood of a) a good deal b) on time to avoid WTO, is looking more and more remote.

    Perhaps your ire would be better directed towards Davis, Fox, Johnson, etc than Adonis.
    I think it’s a reasonable observation that hardcore Remainers have no capacity for critical self-reflection. They are politically and emotionally retarded. Like National Front thickos, one might say.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    So no civil servants agree with government policy.

    Have we not moved on from Yes minister?

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Plenty of messenger-shooting going on, but nothing of substance about the actual message.

    If even half of what Adonis says about our civil service is true, the likelihood of a) a good deal b) on time to avoid WTO, is looking more and more remote.

    Perhaps your ire would be better directed towards Davis, Fox, Johnson, etc than Adonis.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Adonis was history anyway. Another of Blair's cronies appointed way above his pay grade. He jumped before being ignominiously pushed...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Adonis is however right in today's Sunday Times. Grayling needs to go for allowing Virgin Trains East Coast to escape the bill they committed to paying...
    Ironically, that call might be the only thing that saves him from the imminent Cabinet reshuffle.

    As an aside, I particularly enjoyed the way Adonis decided to resign, and to tell us about it. In the Austrian Alps. Skiing. Brilliant.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Sorry but the unelected (and likely unelectable) Adonis being quoted in the Grauniad is not a reliable source of information...

    However I do agree that if the final deal is as good as the tories are optimistically suggesting (of which I am highly sceptical) then were a second referendum to be held it would be a walkover. Although since Parliament has put its collective foot down and it won't be held anyway why is it even being given consideration
    Adonis is however right in today's Sunday Times. Grayling needs to go for allowing Virgin Trains East Coast to escape the bill they committed to paying...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Sorry but the unelected (and likely unelectable) Adonis being quoted in the Grauniad is not a reliable source of information...

    However I do agree that if the final deal is as good as the tories are optimistically suggesting (of which I am highly sceptical) then were a second referendum to be held it would be a walkover. Although since Parliament has put its collective foot down and it won't be held anyway why is it even being given consideration

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    started a topic UK politicians vs unelected bureaucrats

    UK politicians vs unelected bureaucrats

    https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ale-collapsed?



    If Brexit is the best thing for the country, then a second referendum on the final leave terms (or not to leave) should be a doddle. Every voter in the country should be standing behind any call for a final say, after all, didn’t we take back control?

    Last edited by meridian; 30 December 2017, 23:49.
Working...
X