• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Security cleared failed even thou I have SC with MOD"

Collapse

  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by BPPS View Post
    My question is that I was considered a suitable candidate had discussions with the employer

    Originally posted by BPPS View Post
    and agent and in their eyes they were happy to take me on at risk (waiting for the SC to transfer) do I have any legal rights to make against the government agency on taking me on without completing the checks as now it looks like I will not be returning (which I accept) but this has put me in a financial situation which I explained once informed.
    On what grounds do you think you could have a case? You aren't suitable to do the work, so what claim do you think you could be making?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Ah ok. I thought the OP might have a clue himself though. Another nail in the coffin of trying to get clients/agents to drop the 'must have SC' mantra.
    Have faith. That's still a work in progress.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Ah ok. I thought the OP might have a clue himself though. Another nail in the coffin of trying to get clients/agents to drop the 'must have SC' mantra.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    From memory, they don't need to it's just yep or no chance buster
    Correct. Telling you why you failed only means that you now know what to hide from them.

    And as I keep saying, having clearance for one role does not mean it is valid for a different one - the requirement goes with the role, not the person doing it - and not all SOs recognise other people's clearances.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Did they tell you why you failed?
    From memory, they don't need to it's just yep or no chance buster

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Did they tell you why you failed?

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    No lol!

    That's contracting, you're not an employee, get out of that mindset, and look for another contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • BPPS
    started a topic Security cleared failed even thou I have SC with MOD

    Security cleared failed even thou I have SC with MOD

    I recently joined the contracting market as a programme project planning specialist, I was lucky to receive my first assignment this week which commenced Mon 16th June. The problem is that the government agency I have gone to have informed my that I failed the SC checks even thou I renewed my clearance with the MOD last year. As you can imagine what it was like when I was told I could not do any more work for the agency and was formally marched off sit.

    My question is that I was considered a suitable candidate had discussions with the employer and agent and in their eyes they were happy to take me on at risk (waiting for the SC to transfer) do I have any legal rights to make against the government agency on taking me on without completing the checks as now it looks like I will not be returning (which I accept) but this has put me in a financial situation which I explained once informed.

    Any advice would be appreciated Paul
Working...
X