Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Principal Contractors / tax-efficiency / Isle of Man / Trustees"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI've told you this before and will say it again. Unless they are a brand new forumite, encourage them and because they deserve everything they get.
Simple answer, do you understand how the scheme works. Do you receive the money immediately as income or is it a loan, grant, trust payment..... If you don't understand how it works or its any of those things run....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostUsing this sort of scheme will therefore be pretty much equivalent to painting a large bullseye on your back, handing HMRC a rocket launcher and then begging them to give you a 3 second head start.
And I mean a psychiatrist, not an accountant.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by evilagent View PostGenuinely not trolling.
I thought it could open up a conversation about "outlier" accounts set-ups.
Since I have returned to being mostly a contractor, I am getting targeted emails as I now am subscribed to contractor-specific environments.
Apologies if the thread has come across as troll-like.
They appear to be using some sort of loan scheme so this will probably apply http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget-update...x/tiin2675.pdf
If it's a recognised tax avoidance scheme then this will probably apply before long https://www.gov.uk/government/news/t...x-owed-upfront
Using this sort of scheme will therefore be pretty much equivalent to painting a large bullseye on your back, handing HMRC a rocket launcher and then begging them to give you a 3 second head start.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostI think some of them did work under their rules at the time. But given the announcement back in 08, and subsequently gaar it seems unlikely that anything going forward will be sucessful.
Ultimately it doesnt really matter how esoteric transactions may be. You can see what is as the results of the fruits of ones labour. And it will be caught accordingly.
Agreed though that nothing is certain, but I think persistence by HMRC can see most of these schemes go down in flames.Last edited by BlasterBates; 24 February 2014, 10:17.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostI would say no scheme works in the end. These schemes are all based on the income simply being renamed as something else, such as "a loan", artificial arrangements where income contractually doesn't belong to you, but basically you have control of the money and who gets it. HMRC just need to argue their case well. There was a recent case, and the key argument of the judge was that regardless of what happened after the money went overseas that income effectively belonged to the contractor before it ended up in the trust or whatever it was. That's pretty much a catch all for all schemes.
Ultimately it doesnt really matter how esoteric transactions may be. You can see what is as the results of the fruits of ones labour. And it will be caught accordingly.
Leave a comment:
-
I would say no scheme works in the end. These schemes are all based on the income simply being renamed as something else, such as "a loan", artificial arrangements where income contractually doesn't belong to you, but basically you have control of the money and who gets it. HMRC just need to argue their case well. There was a recent case, and the key argument of the judge was that regardless of what happened after the money went overseas that income effectively belonged to the contractor before it ended up in the trust or whatever it was. That's pretty much a catch all for all schemes.
Leave a comment:
-
Arguably we are all under taxed. But only in pedantic terms of the fact that we spend more.
our spend per head is around 11k. With a working population of 38m and an actual population of 63m and an average salary of 27k it is quite clear that personal taxes are going to be fairly high.
Obviously personal taxes are only part of the story. Ultimately though everybody in work needs to produce about 18k in taxes, somewhere along the way.
Of course cutting spending might help. 11k per head does sound like a lot.
Personally I would like to see a flat allowance of 15k. Flat tax of 15% and no ni. Simple to administer. Of course this would reduce the take and we would now have to support all those redundant civil servants.
The balance could be shifted back into the corporate arena.
Ultimately it makes no difference though. The tax, be it corporate or personal, is still produced by the labours of the working population.
My drugs though are 100k. It doesnt take too many expensive cases like me to skew the spending. Then there are all the pensioners. Need to look after them. Unless a cull is planned. Then there are all the kids. Need some sort ofan education.
Maybe the 11k isnt so much after all. Though im sure we could do it considerably better and cheaper.Last edited by ASB; 23 February 2014, 09:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't think that is a fair comparison. Surely the argument would be the permie as the stake in the ground and it would be how under taxed LTD contractors are.. which HMRC obviously agree with. Remember, permies use the rules, we use a loophole which HMRC are actively (and badly) trying to close.
My point was more in the direction of what people would consider a reasonable amount of tax to pay for what they receive. In the end, the only reason HMRC is so fixated on establishing employment even where there isn't any is because of historical precedents (it is mostly a relic by economic controls imposed during the two great wars and after), income is taxed in most of the West, and taxed on a progressively increasing scale, and usually accompanies 'social security' taxes. Employment does come with certain rights and expectations attached to it but the market is evolving and requires greater flexibility, and the lines are blurring between traditional employment and freelancing. Meanwhile, HMRC is still stuck to some outmoded view of what employment is, and expects everyone to behave that way.
Of course their sole purpose is to maximise their collection of revenue, which even that they arguably do badly, luckily for us. But it is politicians and legislators who ultimately decide tax policy, and whether it is 'fair' or economically desirable from the govt's POV. A process usually hijacked by special interests. IMO, if they're taking more than they need to finance the few necessary functions of the govt, including a basic safety net, they're over-taxing. You can argue that entrepreneurial risk taking etc. should be rewarded, but it already is - by profits. Thus why I say permies are over-taxed. I also concur with ASB's and Malvolio's points.Last edited by Zero Liability; 22 February 2014, 16:35.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it is a quirk rather than a loophole. When I started in the early 80s it made stuff all difference. There was a 15% surcharge on dividends. Employers ni was capped on the first x of salary. There was little point in accumulating profits. They were taxed as though they had been distributed anyway.
At the time there were reckoned to be no more than 8000. So as the regime improved under thatcher it wasnt an issue.
Personally I believe the way most contractors operate is more akin to slf employment. I would have been happy to be treated as such. Well I would have moaned a bit because the bills went up but ultimately I would concede it as reasonable.
Several other eu countries have artisan type structures which enable people to benefit from selling their own labours and gain some advantage from it over conventional employment. Perhaps if we started to move in this direction it would have been bettef than ir35 etc and would provided rather more clarity.
I have never thought it right that I was able to structure my affairs to such fiscal advantage. It was probably close to 7 figures over that time. I never felt any guilt either. They weren't my rules, simply those of politicians and their servants who are incapable of thinking anything through.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostContractors using a Ltd company are exploiting a loophole to underpay (avoid) tax?
Not many would publicly acknowledge that.
Clearly, if I'm avoiding paying taxes, I'm not very good at it.
This classic urban myth that we are avoiding taxes is complete and utter bollocks. Using a Ltd Company is perfectly valid and reasonable, and they have a tax structure aligned to their commercial reality. No freelance contractor is avoiding anything (EBT users, Radio 1 DJs and used car traders excepted). And consider this; there are plenty of people in well paid,salaried jobs, who filter their peripheral income though a limited company; income which only derives from their main job (would you pay to hear Gordon Brown make a speech? Thought not...). They are the tax avoiders, not us, and really should be HMRC's main target.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't think that is a fair comparison. Surely the argument would be the permie as the stake in the ground and it would be how under taxed LTD contractors are.. which HMRC obviously agree with. Remember, permies use the rules, we use a loophole which HMRC are actively (and badly) trying to close.
Not many would publicly acknowledge that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostAs an aside, that does illustrate the gain by being a contractor outside IR35, but it also goes to show how over-taxed you are as a permie. I doubt most people would see an issue with retaining 80 - 83% of their income. But you're not likely to ever come near to that as a permie unless you're earning very little.
Leave a comment:
-
As an aside, that does illustrate the gain by being a contractor outside IR35, but it also goes to show how over-taxed you are as a permie. I doubt most people would see an issue with retaining 80 - 83% of their income. But you're not likely to ever come near to that as a permie unless you're earning very little.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: