Originally posted by Emigre
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: EBT or not EBT
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "EBT or not EBT"
Collapse
-
-
This Board is full of threads about EBTs and loans. Why do we need another? Why couldn't the others just be read instead?
The last entry by OP reads exactly like any marketing piece for a new scheme. I think we're all supposed to post here one after another "Who are you going with?" or "Who is it....please?"
The first post by OP was in one of the sticky threads.
Sorry, fed up explaining myself
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigbrainbrad View PostThanks for the comments on this, over the past couple of weeks I have managed to do some further investigation which I hope is useful...
1) This has already been tested in Court and passed. HMRC will claim victory, but that is down to their ability to shut down loop holes, making contribution by UK companies to an EBT a taxable event. They are unable to do this if they do not have jurisdiction, Isle of Man for example, or further a field such as Switzerland etc etc.
Payments from the brolly to the EBT are irellevant. Jurisdiction doesnt matter if they decide on investigation that the loans are in fact disguised income. As a UK resident you will be liable for tax on that income. Doesn't matter where the EBT or brolly are based.
2) It would be impossible for HMRC to tax loans from trusts, companies, foundations or any other entity for that matter, as this would likely cover mortgage payments, credit cards etc.
3) As an employee of the 'offshore' umbrella company, it seems sensible to assume that they will charge a day rate on my behalf to the agency or end company. I simply receive a full UK salary from the umbrella company and they make a contribution to an EBT on my behalf...
4) Now this is where I found it to get interesting. Most of the existing EBT's are not set up correctly to navigate these issues, as they manage all control aspects of payment to contractors, including loans from the EBT - this negates the discretionary nature and ties everything together. If you have a very clear separate line of communication with your umbrella company and Trust and have all appropriate paperwork, there is not a court in the world that could find against this (or at least in my humble opinion).
You do have a written contractual agreement on how your hard earned cash is going to be managed and how it is going to get to you, don't you?
Is your opinion that of a qualified QC with experience of taxation legislation and a track record of successfully defending these schemes in court?
Anyway, just wanted to share the above, based on my research, I will likely go ahead and use an EBT, happy to share further thoughts if anyone is interested...
BBB
You'd have saved a lot of time if you'd just come out and tell us which scheme you are fronting for.Last edited by DaveB; 4 November 2009, 13:58.
Leave a comment:
-
"This has already been tested in Court and passed. HMRC will claim victory, but that is down to their ability to shut down loop holes, making contribution by UK companies to an EBT a taxable event."
Huh? So does that mean it was tested in court and then HMR&C closed the loophole which means it will now be classed as tax avoidance and leave anyone using it liable for a massive tax bill at some point?
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the comments on this, over the past couple of weeks I have managed to do some further investigation which I hope is useful...
1) This has already been tested in Court and passed. HMRC will claim victory, but that is down to their ability to shut down loop holes, making contribution by UK companies to an EBT a taxable event. They are unable to do this if they do not have jurisdiction, Isle of Man for example, or further a field such as Switzerland etc etc.
2) It would be impossible for HMRC to tax loans from trusts, companies, foundations or any other entity for that matter, as this would likely cover mortgage payments, credit cards etc.
3) As an employee of the 'offshore' umbrella company, it seems sensible to assume that they will charge a day rate on my behalf to the agency or end company. I simply receive a full UK salary from the umbrella company and they make a contribution to an EBT on my behalf...
4) Now this is where I found it to get interesting. Most of the existing EBT's are not set up correctly to navigate these issues, as they manage all control aspects of payment to contractors, including loans from the EBT - this negates the discretionary nature and ties everything together. If you have a very clear separate line of communication with your umbrella company and Trust and have all appropriate paperwork, there is not a court in the world that could find against this (or at least in my humble opinion).
Anyway, just wanted to share the above, based on my research, I will likely go ahead and use an EBT, happy to share further thoughts if anyone is interested...
BBB
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostEven at that stage scheme managers were saying it was legitimate and they would defend it to the hilt.
a) Admit it's shortfalls and make the risks clear
b) Tell everyone it's wonderful and gloss over the problems with 3 coats of paint.
In the case of a), the scheme would last about 5 minutes. Hardly anyone would take it up, meaning that the scheme wouldn't be cost effective to run.
So that just leaves us with b)
Leave a comment:
-
well explained Malvolio, simple really if it isn't taxable the money belongs to someone else and you just have to trust them, very risky indeed. The worst would be that HMRC tax it anyway and the Trust runs off with your money.
I mean if you're going to take such risks, why not just gamble a proportion of the profits on the stock markets, and have some fun, if you lose it there you won't be gnashing your teeth that you were diddled.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostHow about reading my blog, there's a recent entry headed "A Taxing Problem" explaining exactly why EBTs are a very bad idea. Bascially it comes dow to how much you want to risk being presented with a six figure tax bill at some point in the (probably not too distant) future...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View Postran perfectly well for 10 years
If the scheme ultimately fails then by the time you find out it will be too late to undo what you did, and you could find yourself facing a massive backdated tax bill with interest added for late payment.
Remember, no matter what anyone tells you, a scheme can't be said to work until either (a) it is tested in a court of law or (b) HMRC concedes that it is lawful and legislates to close the loophole going forward.
Not surprisingly, HMRC prefer (a) than (b).
Leave a comment:
-
There was a perfectly "legitimate" (as the participants were informed) tax scheme, in Germany that ran perfectly well for 10 years, and then the German tax office arrested an accountant in Germany, and all the participants are now facing tax bills of several hundred grand. Even at that stage scheme managers were saying it was legitimate and they would defend it to the hilt. Well German judges don't bother with convoluted arguments on the interpretation of the finer points of tax law, to them its tax evasion so they can slap fines on to boot.
Good just an example that what might on the surface seems to be a perfectly safe solution just might drive you into financial ruin, and it comes out of the blue.Last edited by BlasterBates; 26 October 2009, 10:13.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigbrainbrad View PostFrom what I've heard, the benefits far outweigh the negatives
The "negatives" (HMRC) usually come several years down the line.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigbrainbrad View PostI just posted a reply elsewhere on the forum, but wondered whether anyone had any good or bad experiences in an EBT? From what I've heard, the benefits far outweigh the negatives and it seems reasonably straight forward to set up...
Any comments, greatly received.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigbrainbrad View PostI just posted a reply elsewhere on the forum, but wondered whether anyone had any good or bad experiences in an EBT? From what I've heard, the benefits far outweigh the negatives and it seems reasonably straight forward to set up...
Any comments, greatly received.
Leave a comment:
-
EBT or not EBT
I just posted a reply elsewhere on the forum, but wondered whether anyone had any good or bad experiences in an EBT? From what I've heard, the benefits far outweigh the negatives and it seems reasonably straight forward to set up...
Any comments, greatly received.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: