"Not worth listening to"...in my case it's undoubtedly true! But I enjoy the banter over the radio waves and dearly wish that I could devote more time to it.
I'm pleased that other people are happy with their current service, whichever provider they use. I would simply ask, however: unless you understand the numbers you're provided with, including those in your Annual Accounts, how do you know? I too was blissfully unaware until an HMRC investigation forced me into educating myself and going back through my books.
Rather than an axe to grind, I would prefer to say that I have a drum to bang, one which has "PCG Accredited Accountant" written on the side. Experienced posters can throw tomatoes at me (I like tomtatoes) but my aim is purely altruistic and non-commercial and intended primarily for new-starters who may not be aware of the options available to them.
So, dear person-seeking-an-accountant, please: take no notice of recommendations for accountants posted here; take no notice of recommendations for accountants made by me - I won't ever mention which accountant I use; do take notice of which accountants are accredited by the PCG.
Educate yourself! Understand your Annual Accounts! Use the PCG Accredited Accountants list!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Nixon Williams Junk Mail
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Nixon Williams Junk Mail"
Collapse
-
I have been with Nixon Williams for past 15 months and am very happy with their service. I dont see what all the fuss being made here is about.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ~Craig~ View PostI've been with Nixon Williams for over a year now and have nothing but good things to say about them.
I would have no hesitation in recomending them to other newbies.
Sounds like you have an axe to grind about something..........I think your status of "not worth listening to" is particularly relevant in this case.
Leave a comment:
-
Re Nixon Williams
I use Nixon Williams as my accountant, and they do a good job.
The mail & snail mail stuff is useful at times for a quick read. However if you don't want it don't ask for it. It's not rocket science to opt out.
As for the music on there revamped website, it definitely needs to GO.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ~Craig~ View PostI've been with Nixon Williams for over a year now and have nothing but good things to say about them.
I would have no hesitation in recomending them to other newbies.
Sounds like you have an axe to grind about something..........I think your status of "not worth listening to" is particularly relevant in this case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ~Craig~ View PostI've been with Nixon Williams for over a year now and have nothing but good things to say about them.
I would have no hesitation in recomending them to other newbies.
Sounds like you have an axe to grind about something..........I think your status of "not worth listening to" is particularly relevant in this case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SilasAnother speedy response, less than 1.5 hours this time. You clearly monitor this forum very closely, and it gives the lie to your claims that this is not an important business channel for you.
It’s an unreasonable assumption to make that I’m an unhappy competitor, and it’s wrong.
To any newbies – use the PCG Accredited Accountants list! Ignore the nay-sayers! Ignore the protestations of non-accredited accountants on this forum! You’ll be glad you did!
I would have no hesitation in recomending them to other newbies.
Sounds like you have an axe to grind about something..........I think your status of "not worth listening to" is particularly relevant in this case.
Leave a comment:
-
[quote removed by CUK]
Maybe he subscribes to this thread. I'm sure I would if there was one with my firm's name in the title.
Having said that, I totally agree about using a PCG Accredited Accountant!Last edited by Contractor UK; 5 August 2008, 19:06.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ferret View PostBack to the OP, I have been getting the junk mail too. Several times. Can't be arsed to RTS I just bin it, takes less time.
Leave a comment:
-
I am still not clear if this is aimed at us, however if it is, it is disappointing that you fail to respond to my request to let me have more details on this.
I can only assume from this reluctance that your post is not genuine and probably an unhappy competitor rather than a past client.
If you are genuine then feel free to email me at alanatnixonwilliams.com
Alan
Originally posted by Silas View PostI don't hide behind a name any more than any other of my contractor colleagues on this forum.
At under 2 hours, the speed of response is impressive, truly "More time posting than coding"!
For anyone considering which accountancy service to use, I'll only re-state the point, the moral, of my previous post - please use the PCG Accredited Accountants list. This valuable resource wasn't available when I was making the important decision of which to use and my poor choice cost me dear. Some of the accountancy services posting on this forum are on the list, some are not.
As far as the "hawking" question is concerned, it speaks for itself, and contractors are necessarily a savvy bunch so I don't need to add anything more, save to say that my PCG-approved accountant doesn't undulge in such practices.
Oh and before I go, once again...please use the PCG Accredited Accountants List. You'll be glad you did!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostCan you at least use the right name - they're Quality Accountants, or PCG QA accredited. And while they are universally pretty good, it means they are trained up in the niceties of IR35 and all the other stuff that affects contractors, and are pretty expert in the relevant tax law, it does not mean they are good accountants.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: