- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contract inside IR35, via Umbrella, Agency insists on opt-out of 2003 Regs"
Collapse
-
It's extra fun when an agency tells you that opting in for an outside contract makes it an inside contract.
-
Originally posted by gregNoWorries View Post
Pessimistic, but no doubt truthful.
I'm sure some will be flexible allowing opt in, a few will begrudgingly go along with it but a majority will be opt out or no further.
To be fair though, I don't think I've seen it tested. It's just a pointless exercise and we've not seen an example where an agent says no and the worker takes it all the way. The worker generally folds. No one throws a perfectly good gig away over opt in/out choices.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
At which point you CV will go no further or the offer is made to the next candidate along...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Protagoras View PostWhat stops the worker accepting 'opt-out' initially, and then opting-in later on?
That said, apart from making the agent liable for payment where the client doesn't pay, I'm not sure that it makes much difference for an umbrella worker.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Protagoras View PostWhat stops the worker accepting 'opt-out' initially, and then opting-in later on?
That said, apart from making the agent liable for payment where the client doesn't pay, I'm not sure that it makes much difference for an umbrella worker.
Leave a comment:
-
What stops the worker accepting 'opt-out' initially, and then opting-in later on?
That said, apart from making the agent liable for payment where the client doesn't pay, I'm not sure that it makes much difference for an umbrella worker.
Leave a comment:
-
Yep, they can just bin your CV. The only way to protect yourself is to perform due diligence on the agency and client. This won’t protect you from bad actors, but at least you can see that they (probably) won’t go bust over the duration of your contract.
I never refused the opt-out, most of them were badly written anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gregNoWorries View PostYou cannot be made to Opt Out of the Regs. You may be given a default position to take (eg to opt out) but you don't have to accept it.
Leave a comment:
-
You cannot be made to Opt Out of the Regs. You may be given a default position to take (eg to opt out) but you don't have to accept it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhy do people assume things are illegal just because they don't like them. Most companies aren't generally in the game of doing illegal things.
Google 'The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003 inside contract'
Cojak and someone else looked in to this once and I believe the outcome was that the agency can chose who they want to do business with. If they want to work with opted out people to save themselves some hassle then they can.
Most agencies go for the opt out as they don't have to do more background checks. A few will accept but most won't.
In most cases the opt in/outs are handled so badly they aren't valid and I am yet to see a single issue posted on these forums where the opt in/out made an iota of difference.
Turns out (from a recent post on here) that the umbrella will try to avoid paying due to a lack of authorised timesheets. But that was when there wasn't approved timesheets. However, if the end client signed the timesheets and then went bankrupt I suspect the umbrella is holding a very big liability it would have difficulty paying.
Flipside of that is that the umbrella wouldn't have the worker if they didn't agree to the opt out so it's a delicate balancing act for them (and the other workers with that umbrella).
Leave a comment:
-
Out of interest what have they said regarding an umbrella? Have they given you the standard 5 or 6 companies or are they flexible with who you use? This is probably the area you are going to have to go toe to toe with them over.
Leave a comment:
-
Is it legal for
I had thought not, but looking at the Regs, they only specifically mention a Ltd-Co contractor, as far as I can see.
Cojak and someone else looked in to this once and I believe the outcome was that the agency can chose who they want to do business with. If they want to work with opted out people to save themselves some hassle then they can.
Most agencies go for the opt out as they don't have to do more background checks. A few will accept but most won't.
In most cases the opt in/outs are handled so badly they aren't valid and I am yet to see a single issue posted on these forums where the opt in/out made an iota of difference.
Leave a comment:
-
Contract inside IR35, via Umbrella, Agency insists on opt-out of 2003 Regs
Is it legal for an Agency to insist on a contractor Opting-Out of the The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003 regulations, for an inside IR35 contract, working via an Umbrella co?
I had thought not, but looking at the Regs, they only specifically mention a Ltd-Co contractor, as far as I can see.
So the Agency were keen to put me forward and I agreed, then they sent me the opt-out form which I declined to sign and have not heard from them since. It's actually no biggy really as I wasn't 100% enamoured of the opportunity, but if it *is* illegal to insist on the opt-out, I'd be inclinded to report them.
I deem () the Agency to be insisting on the opt-out.
Personally, I have always contracted as a Ltd-Co (for decades!) and been outside IR35.
What does the team think? This ought to be covered by section (32) of the Regs, clauses 9 to 13, I think.
TIA
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: