• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IR35 contract advice please"

Collapse

  • GhostofTarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by FunkyPigeon View Post
    Thank you all for coming back to me on this thread, all the advice was really appreciated. In the end both the end client and the supplier (recruitment agency) agreed the role was inside IR35 and I left the contract.

    The recruitment agency said they had another role that I was well suited for which I interviewed last Wednesday, and I was offered the role. It is another outside IR35 role and this time I am going to be contracted to a consultancy who are working on a business case/proposal for a central government department.

    I did not receive the contract for the new role until late on Friday and have just managed to fully review it today and again there are no deliverables or milestones in the Statement of Work. I am due to start tomorrow with meetings booked with the government stakeholders from 10am and do not feel comfortable starting without clear deliverables for obvious reasons. I will not be able to speak to my contact at the agency until the morning and disappointed to be in this situation again with the same agency.

    The contract is only for 7 weeks initially so time is of the essence for the consultancy to turn around this work and win this work, so I would feel bad not starting tomorrow but I am telling myself I run a business also.

    Would you all start the work without the contract, ask for the deliverables to be added to the contract and then sign? Am I overthinking all of this?
    I would start tomorrow as there has been no new ir35 investigations for a few years - more chance being hit by lightning than getting investigated


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Does the client actually know what the government client wants?

    If they need to win the work first then it may not be clear what the milestones and/or deliverables are.

    I have had to write my own milestones then get them agreed to and signed off with a client because they were in a similar situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    You do have a contract, it just doesn't contain what you're looking for. If you start it without signing it, the assumption will be that you've accepted it.

    For the most part, agencies don't have a clue about your specific deliverables so I wouldn't expect an agency contract to go to that level of detail. I've contracted twice direct with boutique consultancies and they've issued more detailed information as they're much closer to the coal face, so to speak. Ask the consultancy to issue a statement of your deliverables / milestones and keep that with the contract if you're really worried.

    TL;DR - you're overthinking it.

    Leave a comment:


  • FunkyPigeon
    replied
    Thank you all for coming back to me on this thread, all the advice was really appreciated. In the end both the end client and the supplier (recruitment agency) agreed the role was inside IR35 and I left the contract.

    The recruitment agency said they had another role that I was well suited for which I interviewed last Wednesday, and I was offered the role. It is another outside IR35 role and this time I am going to be contracted to a consultancy who are working on a business case/proposal for a central government department.

    I did not receive the contract for the new role until late on Friday and have just managed to fully review it today and again there are no deliverables or milestones in the Statement of Work. I am due to start tomorrow with meetings booked with the government stakeholders from 10am and do not feel comfortable starting without clear deliverables for obvious reasons. I will not be able to speak to my contact at the agency until the morning and disappointed to be in this situation again with the same agency.

    The contract is only for 7 weeks initially so time is of the essence for the consultancy to turn around this work and win this work, so I would feel bad not starting tomorrow but I am telling myself I run a business also.

    Would you all start the work without the contract, ask for the deliverables to be added to the contract and then sign? Am I overthinking all of this?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Public sectors normally have different frameworks to come in under which usually defines the roles status from the off. If he's in under a managed service agreement but they are using that get bodies on seats then the slide back to the old days has started. Only HMRC/treasury win if PS, and indeed private clients, start this trick all over again.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Regardless, it still depends if you are providing a discrete service or working as a manpower replacement or addition. The consultancy is off the hook only if they are providing a complete service solution such as a new application or website. If they are augmenting the client's workforce then the PS rules will apply.
    Public sectors normally have different frameworks to come in under which usually defines the roles status from the off. If he's in under a managed service agreement but they are using that get bodies on seats then the slide back to the old days has started. No one wins if PS, and indeed private clients, start this trick all over again.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Regardless, it still depends if you are providing a discrete service or working as a manpower replacement or addition. The consultancy is off the hook only if they are providing a complete service solution such as a new application or website. If they are augmenting the client's workforce then the PS rules will apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by FunkyPigeon View Post
    Thank you for all your responses.

    The supplier came back to me today to say they work as an intermediary so the end client, being the local authority in this scenario are in charge of making the IR35 determination. The supplier attached the CEST determination that they received for my piece of work which was completed by the local authority.

    Still strange not to have any agreed deliverables for the work but I guess I keep invoicing and get my head down.
    Yep.

    At some point someone in procurement will realise they've made a balls up. Until then keep invoicing.

    Leave a comment:


  • FunkyPigeon
    replied
    Thank you for all your responses.

    The supplier came back to me today to say they work as an intermediary so the end client, being the local authority in this scenario are in charge of making the IR35 determination. The supplier attached the CEST determination that they received for my piece of work which was completed by the local authority.

    Still strange not to have any agreed deliverables for the work but I guess I keep invoicing and get my head down.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Seems likely that the supply chain is stretching the boundaries of credibility regarding: a) what constitutes a fully contracted out service (and, therefore, resting with you for determination, rather than the end client); and b) the working practices being outside IR35 (sounds like window dressing around a standard T&M contract). That said, as others have indicated, April is only around the corner now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Sounds to me a lot like "smile sweetly and keep on invoicing".

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    It's been a long time since I looked at this and don't remember the outcome but isn't their some nuance to this when the end client of the consultancy is public sector. Didn't that mean in some cases the contractors to the consultancy were already under the public sector rules? There was a lot of confusion back in the day.
    It can be confusing hence why it's important to ensure that it is the end client who makes the determination. Getting a copy isn't about having a copy it's about confirming that the PS client have made the determination so you're in the clear.

    It matters not come April as it's the same for all (small businesses use too few contractors for us to be really concerned about here IMO).

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    are the public sector client responsible for determining your IR35 status?
    If they are, then ask for a copy.
    Then rest easy as it's not your problem.

    Since April 2017 (or was it 2018) they are responsible for the determination and any financial risks with underpayment of tax.
    If the consultancy are your actual client, then it's their problem after April 2021, but yours now. Given that means your maximum exposure is 3 months, the rest easy (but keep some spare cash in case you are found wanting).
    It's been a long time since I looked at this and don't remember the outcome but isn't their some nuance to this when the end client of the consultancy is public sector. Didn't that mean in some cases the contractors to the consultancy were already under the public sector rules? There was a lot of confusion back in the day.

    OP do you know what framework they are engaging the client under? Full service Gcloud thing or a body shopping one?

    I did think the public sector on the whole had gotten on top of this one. My public sector client seems pretty slick at it now with a mix of outside managed service contractors and inside temps on board.

    Leave a comment:


  • FunkyPigeon
    replied
    Thank you Lance.

    I have spoken to an advisor this evening and you are correct at the moment it is my responsibility to make the determination and from April it becomes the consultancy's responsibility.

    I have reviewed the contract again and it states:

    The Consultancy acknowledges that Off-Payroll status is subject to change during the term of the assignment. The Consultancy agrees and accepts that the Supplier is entitled to vary the Agreement to comply with Off-Payroll and may be required to terminate with immediate effect pursuant to clause 9.

    The advisor said that the consultancy should make their determination status now to avoid confusion for April. If I thought the role was inside IR35 I would not have taken the role on, it wasn't until I started the work that the alarms bells started to ring.

    I have spoken with an old colleague who was by co-incidence contracting doing the same role as me now up until 2019 and they were inside IR35 for this role. I am unsure why it has been sold to me as outside IR35.

    At least I have learnt more about the legislation and it makes me stronger for the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    are the public sector client responsible for determining your IR35 status?
    If they are, then ask for a copy.
    Then rest easy as it's not your problem.

    Since April 2017 (or was it 2018) they are responsible for the determination and any financial risks with underpayment of tax.
    If the consultancy are your actual client, then it's their problem after April 2021, but yours now. Given that means your maximum exposure is 3 months, the rest easy (but keep some spare cash in case you are found wanting).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X