• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "High profits one year, low the next; how best to manage corporation tax?"

Collapse

  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by oilboil View Post
    Not if the money only becomes payable on completion as you cannot guarantee that you will complete the work.

    I agree if you are billing a day rate (or similar style) over the accounting period - but there isn't a sensible way to apportion milestone payments as the client owes you "nowt" right up until you trigger the milestone

    so either would be acceptable to Mr HMRC
    Again, not true. I frequently work fixed price, and you need to account for the work in progress at year end, regardless of the terms of your contract with the client, to which HMRC is not party (i.e. it is irrelevant). There is invariably a very sensible way to apportion, and that is to determine what percentage of the work has been done! If you can't estimate that, the client probably made a big mistake.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by oilboil View Post
    Depends how you invoice and recognise income.

    If you are on a monthly gig then not a lot you can do.

    If you are on a "results" or milestone gig then making the final task "spill over" into the next financial year by a couple of day means you'd be invoicing the final payment in Y2 not Y1 - hence reducing Y1 income and increasing Y2 income

    Unless you care about the "vanity" of always making a profit it doesn't make a blind bit of difference in the end. You pay 19% tax on profit (this year and next at least - can change in the future). When you earn it just affects when you pay it - that's the only difference
    I see two pages of replies, so this may have been addressed already, but that isn't correct. You need to account for work in progress at year end, and CT on that amount will be paid in the current year. Ordinarily, this makes little difference (just a question of timing), but it will make a difference come April 2020 when the CT rate reduces to 17%.

    Leave a comment:


  • oilboil
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    Accounts are prepared on an accruals basis. Strictly speaking in the scenario above you should account for work in progress at the year end as an accrual that hasn’t been invoiced so the income for that work is recognised in the correct financial year.
    Not if the money only becomes payable on completion as you cannot guarantee that you will complete the work.

    I agree if you are billing a day rate (or similar style) over the accounting period - but there isn't a sensible way to apportion milestone payments as the client owes you "nowt" right up until you trigger the milestone

    so either would be acceptable to Mr HMRC

    Leave a comment:


  • deserted
    replied
    Thanks very much

    Thanks for all your help guys!

    I think I made a basic mistake here: what I was (foggily) thinking about was somehow deferring the *revenue* from one year to the next. So in that case I could balance the revenue in different years, pay myself the allowance each year and that way pay reduced corporation tax.

    I appreciate that this is probably a ludicrous proposition.

    But this thread has been very helpful, the main message being that if you want to reduce tax, you need to do *tax planning*.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    Originally posted by oilboil View Post
    Depends how you invoice and recognise income.

    If you are on a monthly gig then not a lot you can do.

    If you are on a "results" or milestone gig then making the final task "spill over" into the next financial year by a couple of day means you'd be invoicing the final payment in Y2 not Y1 - hence reducing Y1 income and increasing Y2 income

    Unless you care about the "vanity" of always making a profit it doesn't make a blind bit of difference in the end. You pay 19% tax on profit (this year and next at least - can change in the future). When you earn it just affects when you pay it - that's the only difference
    Accounts are prepared on an accruals basis. Strictly speaking in the scenario above you should account for work in progress at the year end as an accrual that hasn’t been invoiced so the income for that work is recognised in the correct financial year.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigy1874
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    But divis are paid out of post tax profits. So if you make more net profit over two years by carrying back a loss in the second one, you get a bigger pot of retained profits to pay divis from , surely...?
    Eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Maslins View Post
    I don't really see what the problem is. Simply ensure you set aside sufficient funds from the good year so the CT liability can be paid when it falls due.

    If this were personal tax then yes I agree it can make sense to do something a bit more quirky. Reason being you'll pay a far higher overall tax bill if (for example) you earn £100k one tax year, £nil the next, as opposed to £50k each tax year. The same isn't true for corporation tax, as currently it's the same rate regardless of profits.

    So take a bit of care with dividends, it may well make sense to drip feed those across the two years...but the company's profits, doesn't really matter.
    But divis are paid out of post tax profits. So if you make more net profit over two years by carrying back a loss in the second one, you get a bigger pot of retained profits to pay divis from , surely...?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Maslins View Post
    I don't really see what the problem is. Simply ensure you set aside sufficient funds from the good year so the CT liability can be paid when it falls due.

    If this were personal tax then yes I agree it can make sense to do something a bit more quirky. Reason being you'll pay a far higher overall tax bill if (for example) you earn £100k one tax year, £nil the next, as opposed to £50k each tax year. The same isn't true for corporation tax, as currently it's the same rate regardless of profits.

    So take a bit of care with dividends, it may well make sense to drip feed those across the two years...but the company's profits, doesn't really matter.
    That's what I was gonna say but you beat me to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maslins
    replied
    I don't really see what the problem is. Simply ensure you set aside sufficient funds from the good year so the CT liability can be paid when it falls due.

    If this were personal tax then yes I agree it can make sense to do something a bit more quirky. Reason being you'll pay a far higher overall tax bill if (for example) you earn £100k one tax year, £nil the next, as opposed to £50k each tax year. The same isn't true for corporation tax, as currently it's the same rate regardless of profits.

    So take a bit of care with dividends, it may well make sense to drip feed those across the two years...but the company's profits, doesn't really matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • fiisch
    replied
    You've definitely already thought of this, but I'd make two years worth of pension contributions this year and none the next...

    Leave a comment:


  • m0n1k3r
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Ermm...

    Happy if an accountant would confirm it, but you can offset previous years' CT agaisnt in year losses and claim a partial refund...
    Yes you can, and you can also amend last year's CT against the current year and roll back losses in one year against a previous year's CT and get a refund.

    Example:

    2017: £1m profit
    2018: -£250k loss

    Roll back the -£250k to 2017 and declare the following:

    2017: £750k profit
    2018: £0

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Ermm...

    Happy if an accountant would confirm it, but you can offset previous years' CT agaisnt in year losses and claim a partial refund...

    Leave a comment:


  • oilboil
    replied
    Depends how you invoice and recognise income.

    If you are on a monthly gig then not a lot you can do.

    If you are on a "results" or milestone gig then making the final task "spill over" into the next financial year by a couple of day means you'd be invoicing the final payment in Y2 not Y1 - hence reducing Y1 income and increasing Y2 income

    Unless you care about the "vanity" of always making a profit it doesn't make a blind bit of difference in the end. You pay 19% tax on profit (this year and next at least - can change in the future). When you earn it just affects when you pay it - that's the only difference

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    No, there's not really any significant way to do it (for a one-man contractor company, anyway) and it doesn't matter, anyway. Your company will pay the same amount of tax whether it has £1 million in profit this year and zero next, or £500K each year.

    A DL has no bearing on profit/loss and corporation tax.

    You could pay yourself more salary this year and less next, but that would increase your personal taxation.

    Leave a comment:


  • High profits one year, low the next; how best to manage corporation tax?

    Hello!

    I'm lucky that this has been a good year for me with high profits (and subsequently high corporation tax).

    Next year revenue will drop to near zero (by choice).

    I'm wondering if there's any way of evening this out - 'defer' profits until the next tax year, director's loan or something?

    Thanks for your help!

Working...
X