- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IR35 - Employer NIC
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 - Employer NIC"
Collapse
-
-
For an inside ir35 contract it all boils down to how the agency advertise the contract.
Supply teaching is a prime example where it’s usually £140 a day with the agency paying you and £155 a day via an umbrella. Many people sign up for the latter option not knowing (or asking) what they have signed up toLast edited by eek; 29 December 2017, 13:10.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gables View PostUmm, let's say we have a day rate £300 for a contractor who is working through an umbrella; then the PS org would pay the agency £300 + agent fee, the agent would pay the umbrella £300, the umbrella would deduct their fee plus Employer's NIC, then on what's left would deduct employee's NIC and Tax and then pay the contractor ... or am I misunderstanding something?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
Inside IR35 and with a public sector client (which is one caught by the FoI legislation), they are liable for them, but they are actually paid by the intermediary, either your agency or your umbrella, unless you've signed something really silly in your contract (which is always possible).
In any event it has no direct effect on your day rate, although clearly you will need to cover the extra costs somehow, if they apply.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt's really scary how many contactors cba to find out how their business works, isn't it...
Outside IR35 and through YourCo, you are liable for Employers NICs (ErNICs)
Outside or inside IR35 an through an Umbrella, the umbrella are liable but they will recover if from the client (probably via the agency but let's not confuse things)
Inside IR35 and through YourCo and with a private sector client, you are liable for ErNICs
Inside IR35 and with a public sector client (which is one caught by the FoI legislation), they are liable for them, but they are actually paid by the intermediary, either your agency or your umbrella, unless you've signed something really silly in your contract (which is always possible).
In any event it has no direct effect on your day rate, although clearly you will need to cover the extra costs somehow, if they apply.
Simple , isn't it...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by confuddled View PostOkay thats interesting. The rate needs to take into account for NIC?
Outside IR35 and through YourCo, you are liable for Employers NICs (ErNICs)
Outside or inside IR35 an through an Umbrella, the umbrella are liable but they will recover if from the client (probably via the agency but let's not confuse things)
Inside IR35 and through YourCo and with a private sector client, you are liable for ErNICs
Inside IR35 and with a public sector client (which is one caught by the FoI legislation), they are liable for them, but they are actually paid by the intermediary, either your agency or your umbrella, unless you've signed something really silly in your contract (which is always possible).
In any event it has no direct effect on your day rate, although clearly you will need to cover the extra costs somehow, if they apply.
Simple , isn't it...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by washed up contractor View PostIf the other contractors are not doing the exact same job as you, their role may have been determined as outside the IR35 regulations. They may also be lieing as well.
Even if you were inside IR35, you shouldnt be paying employer's NIC. You should only be paying tax and employee NIC.
It’s common for teachers to be told that they can get £155 rather than £140 if they join agency x only to discover that the £140 was after employer ni deductions and the £155 wasn’t
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by washed up contractor View PostIf the other contractors are not doing the exact same job as you, their role may have been determined as outside the IR35 regulations. They may also be lieing as well.
Even if you were inside IR35, you shouldnt be paying employer's NIC. You should only be paying tax and employee NIC.
Of course you could tell your agent \ umbrella \ employer to 'do one' if you arent happy but Id make sure you know what you're talking about and your facts first.
Okay thats interesting. The rate needs to take into account for NIC?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by confuddled View PostGuys,
An interesting one here, where I work some of the contractors have had their rate not affected by Employer NIC being paid by the fee payer.
Myself I was via a different agency, there was no negotiation on my Rate and Employer NIC have been deducted since April.
I should have got rate xxx but have been given rate xxx and the agency still agrees what my that my rate is xxx the original. Where do I stand here do we think?
confuddled x
Even if you were inside IR35, you shouldnt be paying employer's NIC. You should only be paying tax and employee NIC.
Of course you could tell your agent \ umbrella \ employer to 'do one' if you arent happy but Id make sure you know what you're talking about and your facts first.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by confuddled View PostGuys,
An interesting one here, where I work some of the contractors have had their rate not affected by Employer NIC being paid by the fee payer.
Myself I was via a different agency, there was no negotiation on my Rate and Employer NIC have been deducted since April.
I should have got rate xxx but have been given rate xxx and the agency still agrees what my that my rate is xxx the original. Where do I stand here do we think?
confuddled x
Too many xxx’s there, my friend. I have no idea what you’re complaining about.
Leave a comment:
-
IR35 - Employer NIC
Guys,
An interesting one here, where I work some of the contractors have had their rate not affected by Employer NIC being paid by the fee payer.
Myself I was via a different agency, there was no negotiation on my Rate and Employer NIC have been deducted since April.
Just wondering where I stand as - There was no change in rate discussions, the Employer NIC has just been deducted.
confuddled xLast edited by confuddled; 28 December 2017, 16:15.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Leave a comment: