Originally posted by Saint John
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Team lunch business expense?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Team lunch business expense?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIMO absolutely correct.
And as I said I'd ask why you are bothering. If I had a contractor boss and a load of contractors went out I'd full expect to pay my own way. It makes no sense for the boss contractor to pay. Permie thinking that is.
Usually, me having involvement in the recruitment, means they are all more than happy with what they get as a day rate
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Saint John View PostIt therefore appears to me to be a difficult argument to win if the tax man comes asking.
And as I said I'd ask why you are bothering. If I had a contractor boss and a load of contractors went out I'd full expect to pay my own way. It makes no sense for the boss contractor to pay. Permie thinking that is.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks again for your responses.
The general feeling appears to be it would be ok to put the cost through the business but not as a tax deductible expense. This would therefore be classed as an "entertaining expense" which is perfectly acceptable (within limits) with HMRC if the aim of the entertaining is to increase value to the business, for example, aiming to secure a new contract.
However, the 2nd link posted by Northernladuk (thank you for this) states:
"HMRC defines entertainment expenses as those costs you incur when providing either subsidised or free hospitality to clients or staff. Examples of entertaining, whether it is for staff or clients, could include but is not limited to the following: food and drink, theatre or concert tickets, sporting event tickets and use of company assets such as executive suites."
However, my entertainment is neither for clients nor staff, simply for the contractor team that I supervise.
It therefore appears to me to be a difficult argument to win if the tax man comes asking.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostI think the answer was to do it as entertainment rather than an expense. So you can claim it personally from your CO, but it's not an expense you can get CT relief on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Saint John View PostAs my team are not employees of my company, it appears there could be a risk in putting lunch through as a business expense. If there is a spare seat at the table, I'll be back in touch x
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Alan @ BroomeAffinity View PostI think I know who you are. I'll take this up with you offline next week.
We have a right to know!
Leave a comment:
-
I think I know who you are. I'll take this up with you offline next week.
Leave a comment:
-
Many thanks for all the responses, it really is appreciated.
Northernladuk - I have not asked my accountant as I have lost all faith in them since an issue arose in the summer regarding my mortgage application. The lender was waiting for my accountant to complete a form before issuing the mortgage offer. I emailed and phoned them over the course of a few weeks. I received little response to my emails and no response to any phone calls. Luckily it was sorted out in time for the house purchase to go through but a very nerve racking time all the same.
Of course, I raised a complaint with the director of the company who acknowledged receipt of the complaint and promised to respond by the end of the week. That was in August and despite some chasers, no response has been forthcoming. The company also promise to have finalised accounts within 3 months of my business year end - which was in April. I'm still waiting.
The company is Broome Affinity if you are wondering. It appears they may be in the process of setting up Cloudaccountingco which would explain why they don't have any time to deal with their existing clients.
Anyway, I'm a bit off topic and appear to be venting some anger.
Thank you all again for your responses to my post. As my team are not employees of my company, it appears there could be a risk in putting lunch through as a business expense. If there is a spare seat at the table, I'll be back in touch x
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostMy company event had my wife (shareholder) and daughter.
Whilst there's no rule that says the guests have to be staff/relations, HMRC would consider it taking the urine. They would likely go through everything in the company accounts, as it would clearly not be a mistake, and whilst arguably legal, anyone who does this is likely to have done some things that aren't.
In practice that's an easy rule to adhere to if you have 50 employees and invite a handful of clients and suppliers but if it's just you and your spouse I agree that inviting anyone else is likely to be considered taking the piss!
Also remember if you exceed the £150/head limit you're liable to pay tax on the whole value not just for yourself but of any family or household members attending.Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 27 October 2016, 15:04.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostI think that's more a case of legal necessity, it being an absolute requirement of any company director...
However, I was explicitly on about bending the rules.
What others consider "acceptable" behaviour I often don't.
As 90% of my family are self employed we have had both HMRC and the VAT man camped out for a week, at our house, on more than one occasion.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostMy company event had my wife (shareholder) and daughter.
Whilst there's no rule that says the guests have to be staff/relations, HMRC would consider it taking the urine. They would likely go through everything in the company accounts, as it would clearly not be a mistake, and whilst arguably legal, anyone who does this is likely to have done some things that aren't.
The way I always look at it is, if you bend the rules they will find them easily once they start looking. They will then go through absolutely everything.
Its the same point with trying to get your contract IR35 shipshape, the contract is the 1st place they (HMRC) come looking, so is your first point of "defence".
In my view its the same as making your accounts above board and ship shape.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: