Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The dodgy right ear has improved tremendously over the course of last night and today, but it’s still not suitable for having an in-canal hearing aid crammed down there. So I’m having to use my normal one in the left, and the external NHS spare in the right. I’m hoping this will prove to be a workable combination for the purposes of watching films on the telly
The evening's 2nd feature, from very close to the bottom of the pile, was "Timecop (1994)" with the Muscles from Brussels Jean Claude Van Damme, looking remarkably young.
Apparently in 2004 we will have self driving cars which appear to be powered by gas turbines, though they are missing the gull wing doors of "UFO", and, sadly enough, the Ladies with Purple Hair.
It cost the ridiculous sum of £3 from somewhere called Woolworths in July 2008.
Double all-action mayhem tonight with a rewatch of John Wick (2014) and John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017) Why, you ask? It's because the third one arrives today (Saturday) so I thought I'd refresh my memory of the first two. Both good fun in the "brutal slaughter" sense of "fun" and I look forward to watching chapter three tomorrow night
Double all-action mayhem tonight with a rewatch of John Wick (2014) and John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017) Why, you ask? It's because the third one arrives today (Saturday) so I thought I'd refresh my memory of the first two. Both good fun in the "brutal slaughter" sense of "fun" and I look forward to watching chapter three tomorrow night
Goodnight all
I saw the latest one in the cinema. Good all-action nonsense!
I too re-watched the first two before seeing the third
Comment