Originally posted by NickFitz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
Would've been goodOriginally posted by Bunk View PostI first read that as "32-bit graphics". I thought that was a bit advanced for the Amiga.
Though of course nobody could afford enough memory for that back then
Comment
-
-
I'd read it as 32 colour (or color) and understood it as 32 bit colour (or color).

It's soooooo long ago in process terms.Comment
-
I momentarily doubted myself while writing itOriginally posted by zeitghost View PostI'd read it as 32 colour (or color) and understood it as 32 bit colour (or color).

It's soooooo long ago in process terms.
Resolution of 320x200 => 8000 bytes for a single bitplane. Due to various complexities relating to scrolling and the way the screens were mapped (which was originally done for a flip-screen technique on the ST, and not adaptable to progressive rendering in anything but full screen images), the screen buffer had to be three screen widths, and there had to be two (so the next set of screens could be drawn on one while the other buffer was being displayed), so that's 48000 bytes for 1 bit, meaning 16 colours (4 bit) would have needed 192,000 bytes; but the extra bit for 32 colours bumped it up to 240,000, or just under 240K. That's just for display ram. All the sprites used for building the landscapes and for the characters also went up in size by 25% compared to the original versions.
It's no wonder the finished product, once my minuscule bit of debug code was removed, had something like 112 bytes free on a 512K machine
Comment
-
-

Morning all.

The Agent Orange mould killer stuff is doing its thing.
I've almost got the kitchen back to a state where I can cook Sunday lunch.
I don't think I'll be cleaning the houses today.Comment
-
Afternoon all
Comment
-
Mr N is back later today, bearing proper cheddar, lamb, venison and sausages as well as Nyetimber
Comment
-
Still not feeling 100% today.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment