I've been out of the loop on IR35 developments until recently and was wondering if there have been any legal arguments brought in any of the cases to have certain parts of the legislation stuck out as incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights? The Courts have been known to throw out parts of subordinate UK legislation as incompatible with ECHR for interfering with the Courts discretion (see https://www.cms-lawnow.com/ealerts/2...ted?cc_lang=en) and it seems the preposterous nature of IR35 breaches ECHR in two key areas:
Also, it seems that any Barristers who operate via an Ltd would fall under IR35 especially where they receive all of their business via a single solicitors firm. Has anyone any evidence that HMRC has excluded the solicitor/barrister engagement from IR35 and if not have they investigated any such engagements? I guess not as they only want low hanging fruit. It seems unfair to me that whole industries would be excluded from the application of "the law" solely due to HMRC discretion.
- that an end-client can determine the business status of a third party service provider (breach of Article 8 has been held to include the right to a business)
- the Court is directed to ignore an actual contract and instead create a hypothetical contract, this should be fully at the Courts discretion (breach of all common sense and hundreds of years of common law, breach of various ECHR sections as per Wilson v First County)
Also, it seems that any Barristers who operate via an Ltd would fall under IR35 especially where they receive all of their business via a single solicitors firm. Has anyone any evidence that HMRC has excluded the solicitor/barrister engagement from IR35 and if not have they investigated any such engagements? I guess not as they only want low hanging fruit. It seems unfair to me that whole industries would be excluded from the application of "the law" solely due to HMRC discretion.
Comment