Originally posted by DealorNoDeal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Edge EBT thread
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
For Q3 even if the money is being treated as income it can still be from a trust and trusts are subject to IHT. Yes it seems unfair but all loan money is Schroders Money and can be multiple things at the same time. -
Q1) Settlement is final and irrevocable. There's no unwinding it no matter what the outcome of future court cases.
Q2) Yes, it's an error. The loan charge does not apply to loans before Dec 2010.
Q3) Don't know. It's a murky area.Leave a comment:
-
Wording in Offer to Settle
Firstly apologies if these questions have been answered before or if I'm posting in the wrong place. I'm new here. I have searched but not found the answers.
Briefly, Edge 2006-7. In 2016, paid HMRC sums equivalent to PAYE thinking this would be the end of it. My mistake. Every time I try to finish this it seems HMRC has another hoop for me to jump through. Need to pay interest and formally make offer to settle. I'm willing to do that to be shot of them but am concerned about the wording I'm being asked to sign.
So: Q1 The offer letter has:
"I undertake not to take any action with a view to obtaining repayment from HMRC of any part of the Settlement Amount including but not limited to making a claim under:
(a) Schedule 1AB (Recovery of overpaid tax etc) of the Taxes Management Act 1970; or
(b) common law"
Am I right that HMRC's position has not been tested in law yet? That a future ruling might go against them such that the scheme is deemed to be valid?
Does this wording mean that in the event that HMRC is found to have exceeded its powers in some future court case (in which case the sums I've paid them would have been an over-payment of tax) then I have no way of recovering those sums?
-----
I failed to settle by 30 Sept as I couldn't get HMRC to answer this. I also receive letters about Loan Charge.
Q2: Is this an error as surely this doesn't apply as I left the scheme in 2007?
----
Finally Q3:
HMRC seems to be talking about IHT on loans. If I settle with them, in effect accepting that the 'loans' were 'income' then how can these sums subsequently be treated as loans for IHT purposes?
Any help gratefully received.Leave a comment:
-
ok cheers - seems unfair, but then the whole thing was unfair
ok cheers - seems unfair, but then the whole thing was unfairLeave a comment:
-
-
It sounds like you settled an open enquiry, in which case SAM recommendations would not help you, regardless of your open year being pre December 2010.Originally posted by Mayr4ofen View PostHi - i was in the Edge EBT pre December 2010 and settled with the HMRC in 2015 as part of a settlement offer
Was anyone same situation ? am i due a refund from HMRC
Thanks
There is a flow chart that someone shared which would help you understand this.
Post note Flow ChartLast edited by Superfly; 6 October 2020, 09:55.Leave a comment:
-
I assume this was paid via an APN. If so then I dont think you are if you are referring the Sir Moorse recommendationsOriginally posted by Mayr4ofen View PostHi - i was in the Edge EBT pre December 2010 and settled with the HMRC in 2015 as part of a settlement offer
Was anyone same situation ? am i due a refund from HMRC
ThanksLeave a comment:
-
Pre 2010 member
Hi - i was in the Edge EBT pre December 2010 and settled with the HMRC in 2015 as part of a settlement offer
Was anyone same situation ? am i due a refund from HMRC
ThanksLeave a comment:
-
who told you?Originally posted by demby View PostSomeone has told me that HMRC have said as soon as the settlement is agreed as far as they are concerned the case is closed. No other income tax or inheritance tax to be applied whether the loans are written off or not
What qualification/experience did they have?
The statement you make is almost certainly untrue in many circumstances.
Please be careful about listening too and/or believing what the man at the socially distanced pub says.Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Leave a comment: