Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I was with IQ Contracts / Darwin pay and have now received the section 9a letter requesting all sorts of information for the 12/13 return. I spoke to IQ and they said the directors closed down the company and have created a new one called IQ Consulting (UK) Limited (with the same IQ contracts branding). CHS are "looking after" the contractors but they basically said as it currently stands they won't be defending the scheme that was in place back then but they are "monitoring the situation".
To me it looks like the directors of IQ have taken a lot of money, closed the company and moved on leaving contractors in the lurch with minimal support. How they can expect people to stay with them (which I'm not) is beyond me. I expect they'll do the same with their new schemes leaving the suckers to pick up the pieces.
Please could someone give me PM rights so I can join the other forum?
Thanks
Dan
Last edited by funkymonkey; 24 February 2015, 23:13.
Does anybody know (for sure) whether APN's have been issued to any 'everyday' scheme users yet, such as Sanzar etc ?
This month Contractors who used the BN66 scheme, promoted by Montpelier, deGraaf etc, started receiving pre-APN letters from HMRC saying that APNs will be issued in the next few weeks.
This month Contractors who used the BN66 scheme, promoted by Montpelier, deGraaf etc, started receiving pre-APN letters from HMRC saying that APNs will be issued in the next few weeks.
There were around 2000 users in the scheme.
I'd dispute the APN.
What would HMRC do then?
They just push people who have nothing to lose into an all or nothing position.
If say 25-40% of people dispute the APNs the HMRC beast would just grind to a halt.
If that isn't mass-marketed tax avoidance on an industrial scale that fall under GAAR I don't know is.
That's incorrect.
I wish that there was a pattern or a plan within HMRC for issue, but there isn't. It appears to be random and based on who can grab the work teams.
I know of APN's on some Ingenious Media partnerships (sub judice at the moment); some other film schemes; some EZ/BPRA schemes. Icebreaker get no APN's because the case is sub judice and not disclosed.
Incidentally, "aggressive and contrived" is how I've heard HMRC describe most contractor schemes.
Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
Comment