...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Regulation 80/Section 8 - Do HMRC Make Mistakes?
Collapse
X
-
Regulation 80/Section 8 - Do HMRC Make Mistakes?
Last edited by inspectorgadget; 3 March 2025, 06:55. -
I think the "third party" is the limited company for your subcontractors. I.e. HMRC are saying that those people are actually inside IR35 rather than outside, and therefore you should have been paying them as employees (and then paying the appropriate PAYE/NI to HMRC).
Have they given you a breakdown of the figures? ("£35k in NICs and £82k in PAYE") If not, that seems like a good place to start. I.e. does this apply to everyone who's been a subcontractor for you or only to specific work?
The situation you're in is why most agencies put in "clawback clauses", saying that the contractor is liable if HMRC dispute the IR35 status, i.e. they don't want to be stuck with the same bills that you've received.
Regarding the ad-hoc days, you said that they're doing work for your clients (rather than for you specifically), e.g. you haven't hired them to do your company accounts. Did the end clients issue an SDS? Or are they small companies (so that the subcontractors would be responsible for the determination)? You mentioned ITEPA chapter 8 rather than chapter 10, but it's worth clarifying this point. -
So the immediate leap out to me is that you haven't been reporting what you've been paying people via agency reporting.
Your second issue is that as an agency you shouldn't have been paying people as a sole trader..
Get yourself a decent tax advisor and get them to speak to HMRC..merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Following up on my previous post:
Just to clarify, "self-employed" means "sole trader". However, I assume that you've been working through your limited company. I don't want to be pedantic, but you need to be careful about this to avoid confusion.Originally posted by inspectorgadget View PostSince 2015 I have been carrying out ad-hoc quality engineering work myself for various clients. Jobs will be solitary days here and there, maybe assignments for a few weeks at a time, the odd longer-term job which may last around a year but always working for various clients on various jobs at any one time so very much legitimately self-employed and I'd say safely outside of IR35.
I've just remembered that the IR35 rules changed in April 2021. I.e. if your clients were in the private sector then they wouldn't have issued an SDS (so ignore my previous question about that).I received the letter today saying that for the year 2020/21 I owe £35k in NICs and £82k in PAYE!Comment
-
OP said he/she has an accountant. Shouldn't accountants be aware of this agency stuff?Originally posted by eek View PostSo the immediate leap out to me is that you haven't been reporting what you've been paying people via agency reporting.
Your second issue is that as an agency you shouldn't have been paying people as a sole trader..
Get yourself a decent tax advisor and get them to speak to HMRC..Comment
-
They see invoices going in and out - why would they care about this type of detail..Originally posted by woody1 View Post
OP said he/she has an accountant. Shouldn't accountants be aware of this agency stuff?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Hypothetically, what if the OP had provided details to the accountant of what they were doing (using ltd and sole trader subbies)? Would you expect an accountant to red flag that?Originally posted by eek View Post
They see invoices going in and out - why would they care about this type of detail..
PS. just noticed the OP has erased their post, whatever that meansComment
-
Mine wouldn't.Originally posted by woody1 View Post
Would you expect an accountant to red flag that?
They advise me on tax, how to arrange the companies finances and prepare the returns, mainly.
They are not lawyers, and are very keen not to be seen as a managed services company.
So they would leave the running of the company and how it makes money up to the director.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Today 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11

Comment