• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ritwolf
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    That may be HMRC's position, but it isn't what the legislation says, notably:



    And:



    And:
    Thanks, this is my understanding at the moment as well, but it's more helpful to see the relevant legislation.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Lotok View Post

    Sorry you are wrong. They are including everything and expecting you to claim back corporation tax paid. DK was doing conditional requests because I believe there is a cut off period and if this is drawn out people risk being double taxed.
    That may be HMRC's position, but it isn't what the legislation says, notably:

    61E Calculation of deemed employment payment


    (1)The amount of the deemed employment payment is the amount resulting from the following steps—

    Step 1

    Find (applying section 61F) the amount of the payment or benefit mentioned in section 61D(1)(b).
    And:

    61D Worker treated as receiving earnings from employment


    (1)This section applies if—

    (a)the services of an individual (“the worker”) are provided (directly or indirectly) by a managed service company (“the MSC”),

    (b)the worker, or an associate of the worker, receives (from any person) a payment or benefit which can reasonably be taken to be in respect of the services, and
    And:

    61F Sections 61D and 61E: application of rules relating to earnings from employment


    (1)The following provisions apply for the purposes of sections 61D and 61E.

    (2)A “payment or benefit” means anything that, if received by an employee for performing the duties of an employment, would be general earnings from the employment.

    (3)The amount of a payment or benefit is taken to be—

    (a)in the case of a payment or cash benefit, the amount received, and

    (b)in the case of a non-cash benefit, the cash equivalent of the benefit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lotok
    replied
    Originally posted by ritwolf View Post
    Where thhe article says:



    I think this is the only wrong bit I see in the article. My understanding (also from previous posts in this thread) is that the PAYE and NIC is levied on income earned by the contractor, not by the business.

    Unless I'm missing something of course, but I really hope I'm right here.
    Sorry you are wrong. They are including everything and expecting you to claim back corporation tax paid. DK was doing conditional requests because I believe there is a cut off period and if this is drawn out people risk being double taxed.

    Leave a comment:


  • ritwolf
    replied
    Where thhe article says:

    When HMRC categorises a firm as an MSC provider it deems all its clients as users of an MSC and levies PAYE and national insurance on any income earned by the contractors’ businesses.
    I think this is the only wrong bit I see in the article. My understanding (also from previous posts in this thread) is that the PAYE and NIC is levied on income earned by the contractor, not by the business.

    Unless I'm missing something of course, but I really hope I'm right here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snooky
    replied
    Originally posted by Lotok View Post
    gota non paywall version?
    archive dot md is your friend

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    Search for the headline HMRC criticised over year-long tax probe delay on Google, click the link and you will see the article.

    The FT paywall is how things should be done - a little hassle to get to the article but accessible if you need it.
    And if it doesn’t work with Google, try Bing.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Lotok View Post
    gota non paywall version?
    Search for the headline HMRC criticised over year-long tax probe delay on Google, click the link and you will see the article.

    The FT paywall is how things should be done - a little hassle to get to the article but accessible if you need it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lotok
    replied
    gota non paywall version?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce88
    replied
    https://www.ft.com/content/cc180503-...6-4bcb9ba3b3c0

    New article in the FT regarding the HMRC MSC investigation. Basically calling out the HMRC for lack of progress and failing to deal with the specifics of each case.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickLeeson2
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post
    You should have received a reference number in your correspondence with HMRC.

    You need to use that reference number to pay on account. If you have, as it sounds, started a dialogue with HMRC then ask them for a reference number to allow you to pay on account. Once you have the number payments can begin.

    As is well documented here I had my first two years thrown out, however despite paying HMRC in March 2022 I still haven't received the PoA amounts back
    They seemed to have stopped issuing reference numbers for paying on account. It is as if they don't care.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X