Originally posted by Fred Bloggs
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Things about to get very serious and much more real? / Felicitas Letters
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by happychap View PostI'd like to know, how are these Statutory Demands being served....
According to the www.gov./statuorydemands/how-to-serve info this has to be delivered to you and signed for.
Is this whats happening?Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by Shay58 View PostI am guilty, I did give them all of my details in the very first instance, via email when they first emailed, as they had my old address etc. so I gave them all updated details...…
Also, does the SD just demand repayment in full, or does it still talk about reaching an agreement etc etc ?Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by DanJackiels View Postif you never confirmed your details/address etc, and they still send you the SD...is it valid?
One thing to add.......
The costs to petition someone for bankruptcy total £1270. Felicitas will need to pay this up front for each and every person they wanted to try and bankrupt.
Also, my guess is that the reason they asked for money to be paid into the account of a different business (highly suspicious anyway), was that even if costs are awarded against them, they are a shell company and don't have any assets, any money is in their friends account. I would expect this to be taken into account should this end up in court, as the courts will be able to see that the likelihood of them paying costs etc are more or less zero, so would probably require them to pay costs on account.
I have no idea how many people Felicitas are chasing, but to petition bankruptcy for just 100 of them will cost Felicitas £127k................do they want to pay that.......that's the question.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrO666 View PostI believe that they would need to make every effort to ensure that you have been contacted and provide evidence of that. So potentially sending the SD to multiple addresses etc, I'm not sure.
One thing to add.......
The costs to petition someone for bankruptcy total £1270. Felicitas will need to pay this up front for each and every person they wanted to try and bankrupt.
Also, my guess is that the reason they asked for money to be paid into the account of a different business (highly suspicious anyway), was that even if costs are awarded against them, they are a shell company and don't have any assets, any money is in their friends account. I would expect this to be taken into account should this end up in court, as the courts will be able to see that the likelihood of them paying costs etc are more or less zero, so would probably require them to pay costs on account.
I have no idea how many people Felicitas are chasing, but to petition bankruptcy for just 100 of them will cost Felicitas £127k................do they want to pay that.......that's the question.
i just need to try and figure out what solicitor to use when it comes to that.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrO666 View Post....and how did you receive the SD ?
Also, does the SD just demand repayment in full, or does it still talk about reaching an agreement etc etc ?Comment
-
Originally posted by MrO666 View PostI believe that they would need to make every effort to ensure that you have been contacted and provide evidence of that. So potentially sending the SD to multiple addresses etc, I'm not sure.
One thing to add.......
The costs to petition someone for bankruptcy total £1270. Felicitas will need to pay this up front for each and every person they wanted to try and bankrupt.
Also, my guess is that the reason they asked for money to be paid into the account of a different business (highly suspicious anyway), was that even if costs are awarded against them, they are a shell company and don't have any assets, any money is in their friends account. I would expect this to be taken into account should this end up in court, as the courts will be able to see that the likelihood of them paying costs etc are more or less zero, so would probably require them to pay costs on account.
I have no idea how many people Felicitas are chasing, but to petition bankruptcy for just 100 of them will cost Felicitas £127k................do they want to pay that.......that's the question.
Mind you £1270 is probably cheaper than the court case fee which is probably why they are going for this approach...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostYes. That's exactly what is happening. They're being sent registered post.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostIt's another time where I can't work out their motive for the approach they are using - unless the people who are being chased are those who ignored the mediation offer so they are going down this approach rather than the court approach.
Mind you £1270 is probably cheaper than the court case fee which is probably why they are going for this approach...
What's odd here, is that in many of these cases there's certainly a strong basis for dispute. Based on that, then it's highly likely that a court would set aside any SD on that basis, and then in turn award costs.
From what I understand, a Statutory Demand should never be used when there is clear indication of a debt dispute.
What I'm a bit unclear about is this:
If someone receives a SD, disputes it with whatever law firm sends it, and that law firm drops or withdraws the claim, does that mean that no court is involved, hence no opportunity to award costs ? Or is it that a court would only get involved if the creditor refused to drop/withdraw the claim after a dispute was submitted, so then it would proceed to court ?Last edited by MrO666; 13 November 2020, 15:57.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment