Been looking into the Statute of Limitations act, and as far as I can tell this seems like a fairly robust argument, assuming of course an individuals case meets the criteria.
The three criteria which MUST be met for someone to claim that an alleged debt is statute barred is:
1) There must have been no written communication from the borrower to the lender that in any way acknowledges that a debt exists in the past 6 years.
2) No payment towards the alleged debt has been made in the past 6 years.
3) The creditor has not commenced court proceedings against you in relation to this debt within the past 6 years.
Providing that all three of those conditions can be met, then from what I can tell, a debt is statute barred, plain and simple.
For a lender to dispute this, the requirement is for the lender to prove that those three conditions have not been met, and to provide evidence to substantiate that claim.
I used Sanzar back in the day, and I am 100% certain that I have not had any form of contact with anyone in relation to the Sanzar schemes since probably 2012. I ignored all of the communications relating to offering to wipe the debt for a fee etc, and have not had any other communications in relation to Sanzar. I am not in receipt of any letter, however if I do get one, then this will be my immediate response, although I'll be getting a solicitor to send it so that GS don't think I'm chancing it.
The three criteria which MUST be met for someone to claim that an alleged debt is statute barred is:
1) There must have been no written communication from the borrower to the lender that in any way acknowledges that a debt exists in the past 6 years.
2) No payment towards the alleged debt has been made in the past 6 years.
3) The creditor has not commenced court proceedings against you in relation to this debt within the past 6 years.
Providing that all three of those conditions can be met, then from what I can tell, a debt is statute barred, plain and simple.
For a lender to dispute this, the requirement is for the lender to prove that those three conditions have not been met, and to provide evidence to substantiate that claim.
I used Sanzar back in the day, and I am 100% certain that I have not had any form of contact with anyone in relation to the Sanzar schemes since probably 2012. I ignored all of the communications relating to offering to wipe the debt for a fee etc, and have not had any other communications in relation to Sanzar. I am not in receipt of any letter, however if I do get one, then this will be my immediate response, although I'll be getting a solicitor to send it so that GS don't think I'm chancing it.
Comment