Originally posted by WalterWhite
View Post
Its prob relevant to note the following
1. I was not the person who devised the scheme.
2.I was not a shareholder or director of insella
3.I do not make, nor will ever make a single penny of profit from insella or the scheme. This is not clever careful wording, it is simply factual. I did not charge fees for considering the scheme. In layman terms, it provides zero benefit to my financial situation whatsoever under any circumstance. There are no payments to me directly or indirectly. There is no financial gain.
What are the chances (%) of success in your opinion?
Do you feel any other "schemes to fix a scheme work?
If yes, did you ever suggest them to your clients, or just your own?
If yes, did you ever suggest them to your clients, or just your own?
I would add btw that afaik there is no actual definition of a scheme. Its basically any interpretation or planning that differs from HMRC. Therefore this includes any thoughts or suggestions that HMRC are interpreting legislation incorrectly. It does not matter whether its called a scheme or not. Its the same. Think about this people.
If no, why is yours different?
Why did you pull your website down on 25th April, two days before the Times Article?
How do people that have taken up your solution contact you in the future if they have any problems?
Do you feel your unprofessional comments towards Mel Stride and HMRC on Twitter actually help anybody associated with this whole mess?
Comment