Originally posted by NickFitz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
WWDC
Collapse
X
-
-
Yet that's what Apple do. If you want to develop for iOS or the Mac App Store, you have to play by Apple's rules. If at some point in the future Apple decide they are going to phase out support for Objective-C (and they aren't just going to drop it overnight) then they will. And people will accept it and learn Swift if they haven't already.Originally posted by d000hg View PostTelling developers "we know better than you which tools you should use" is unwise...
Its easy to see which way the ball is rolling. They've been working on Swift for about 4 years as far as I'm aware and many of the recent advances in Objective-C and LLVM have also been geared towards the eventual release of Swift I believe. They obviously decided that they had advanced Objective-C as much as they could with the limitations of it being built on C.
As soon as new developer technologies and APIs start being geared towards Swift rather than Objective-C in a way that makes backwards compatibility difficult, they'll start to phase it out and it won't take that long either. The vast majority of iOS/Mac developers are going to learn Swift and I think most will welcome the change.
Don't get me wrong, I've grown to like Objective-C over the years but I'll be the first to admit there's probably some kind of "stockholm syndrome" about my like for it. Its still early days for Swift, I'm excited to see where Apple go with it.
No doubt there will be some who resist the change and refuse to learn Swift...it will be their loss. They'll become like those people who still write classic ASP in VBScript.Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 4 June 2014, 11:37.Comment
-
Don't forget, the existing Obj-C codebase isn't all 99p iOS games or nifty little Mac utilities. How much effort do you think Adobe would have to put in to rewrite their Creative Cloud suite in a new language? Is there any business case for a ground-up rewrite of industry standard video editor Final Cut Pro?Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostAs soon as new developer technologies and APIs start being geared towards Swift rather than Objective-C in a way that makes backwards compatibility difficult, they'll start to phase it out and it won't take that long either. The vast majority of iOS/Mac developers are going to learn Swift and I think most will welcome the change.
These, and others, are utterly huge amounts of extremely complex code, and Apple's platform needs them. Don't expect to see Obj-C support eliminated in less than the time it takes to rewrite all such apps from scratch, or introduce replacements that take their markets.Comment
-
I realise that and I said Obj-C isn't going to go away overnight. But I'd certainly expect Swift to become the only supported language on iOS within the next 3 years. OSX might take longer for the reasons you've stated.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostDon't forget, the existing Obj-C codebase isn't all 99p iOS games or nifty little Mac utilities. How much effort do you think Adobe would have to put in to rewrite their Creative Cloud suite in a new language? Is there any business case for a ground-up rewrite of industry standard video editor Final Cut Pro?
No longer supported doesn't have to mean "won't work"...it could mean: no new developments to the language (I expect this won't take long at all), reduced support on newer OS versions, no support for newer APIs or frameworks. Like I said, it will be gradual and I suspect you'll be able to write OSX apps using Objective-C for quite a while, although you won't necessarily be able to sell them through the Mac App Store.Comment
-
I did a project for some american company who were trying to do MVC in Asp (Yup not .Net) and thought using the parallax effect in jquery was cutting edge....shudderOriginally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostNo doubt there will be some who resist the change and refuse to learn Swift...it will be their loss. They'll become like those people who still write classic ASP in VBScript.
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Hmm, you can still write OSX applications in pure C++ can't you, using Carbon? That was only deprecated 2 years ago!Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI realise that and I said Obj-C isn't going to go away overnight. But I'd certainly expect Swift to become the only supported language on iOS within the next 3 years. OSX might take longer for the reasons you've stated.
No longer supported doesn't have to mean "won't work"...it could mean: no new developments to the language (I expect this won't take long at all), reduced support on newer OS versions, no support for newer APIs or frameworks. Like I said, it will be gradual and I suspect you'll be able to write OSX apps using Objective-C for quite a while, although you won't necessarily be able to sell them through the Mac App Store.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Carbon is deprecated but pretty much dead in the water, especially if you want to write a native 64 bit app.Originally posted by d000hg View PostHmm, you can still write OSX applications in pure C++ can't you, using Carbon? That was only deprecated 2 years ago!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment