Glad you joined CUK hireonomy?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agency bug bears
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostGlad you joined CUK hireonomy?
But for me, the real question is:
If hireonomy / deerfoot were not legally compliant with their websites and didn't know it, and they were advised of changes that needed to be made and made some changes, but are still not compliant and presumably still don't know it, then where else in their business practices are they not legally compliant, and would they know if they are not legally compliant?The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Maybe they are compliant & knowledgeable in the area they work in rather than in the requirements of running a website. It's not a big stretch to imagine an extremely experienced, excellent accountant starting up a local accountancy business after leaving a big firm, and simply not realising you have to do such things as put your VAT number on your website. It shows a lack of research to a degree, which is not wonderful, but doesn't mean they aren't a good accountant.
Remember, when you form a company nobody sends you a list of rules or a handy checklist. You don't know what you don't know sometimes.
It's more worrying their web-design company don't know this stuff, because this IS something they do every day. One might easily fail to notice one's new website was missing such information even if one knew it was required, since it is typically not plastered anywhere highly visible, it's the kind of thing that can slip one's mind as standard human error.
Would their web-design company be culpable for designing a site not meeting legal requirements do you think?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostMaybe they are compliant & knowledgeable in the area they work in rather than in the requirements of running a website. It's not a big stretch to imagine an extremely experienced, excellent accountant starting up a local accountancy business after leaving a big firm, and simply not realising you have to do such things as put your VAT number on your website. It shows a lack of research to a degree, which is not wonderful, but doesn't mean they aren't a good accountant.
Remember, when you form a company nobody sends you a list of rules or a handy checklist. You don't know what you don't know sometimes.
It's more worrying their web-design company don't know this stuff, because this IS something they do every day. One might easily fail to notice one's new website was missing such information even if one knew it was required, since it is typically not plastered anywhere highly visible, it's the kind of thing that can slip one's mind as standard human error.
Would their web-design company be culpable for designing a site not meeting legal requirements do you think?
But also, we've told them what to change, directed them to an information source, and they still can't get it right. I have no idea whether the web-design company has any culpability, but this agency, surely does.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostWould their web-design company be culpable for designing a site not meeting legal requirements do you think?
The web design company includes this information on their own website, and it's also on the websites of other clients of theirs, so it seems unlikely that they are oblivious to the fact that some clients ask for the information to be included.Comment
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostBut also, we've told them what to change, directed them to an information source, and they still can't get it right. I have no idea whether the web-design company has any culpability, but this agency, surely does.
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf the requirements included "ensure that it complies with the Companies Act", then absolutely. If the requirement didn't include any instructions on content, then probably not.
Maybe they're using some Bob outfit, certainly in my mind it's a poor endorsement of both parties.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostGlad you joined CUK hireonomy?
Ref being "compliant & knowledgeable" - again, i'll refer this to the relevant people who can take this up.
Once I was made aware of the omissions on the website (Co. Name, Co. Number, Reg Add, VAT No.), it was resolved at the earliest opportunity.
Personally, I'm not an expert in website / business requirements... unlike those who post on here... and have not the first clue what these additional 4 items are, so I will simply pass the message to the relevant people to rectify as necessary. Please do feel free to adviseComment
-
Originally posted by Hireonomy View PostAbsolutely! All forums are interesting and have interesting characters posting.
Ref being "compliant & knowledgeable" - again, i'll refer this to the relevant people who can take this up.
Once I was made aware of the omissions on the website (Co. Name, Co. Number, Reg Add, VAT No.), it was resolved at the earliest opportunity.
Personally, I'm not an expert in website / business requirements... EXACTLYlike those who post on here... and have not the first clue what these additional 4 items are, so I will simply pass the message to the relevant people to rectify as necessary. Please do feel free to adviseLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Hireonomy View PostAbsolutely! All forums are interesting and have interesting characters posting.
Not this one.. It's full of friendless geeks with PCS parked next to their trainsetsLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Hireonomy View PostAbsolutely! All forums are interesting and have interesting characters posting.
Ref being "compliant & knowledgeable" - again, i'll refer this to the relevant people who can take this up.
Once I was made aware of the omissions on the website (Co. Name, Co. Number, Reg Add, VAT No.), it was resolved at the earliest opportunity.
Personally, I'm not an expert in website / business requirements... unlike those who post on here... and have not the first clue what these additional 4 items are, so I will simply pass the message to the relevant people to rectify as necessary. Please do feel free to adviseThe material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment