Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Agency bug bears
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Agency bug bears"
Collapse
-
So true. The other day some winker had the audacity to try to dictate how everybody else should use the forums like and thank features!!
-
I don't think many contractors on CUK should dare be quick to accuse other people of arrogance. Arrogance is the backbone of CUK.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyIt's this overweening arrogance, like the receptionist at a doctors surgery.
Leave a comment:
-
TwatonomyOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyOk one last one ...
Pimponomy
Leave a comment:
-
NoncompliantonomyOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyIt's this overweening arrogance, like the receptionist at a doctors surgery. Just because you book people in/out and decide what appointments are free, it doesn't make you a doctor, in fact it doesn't really mean tulip.
Instead of Hireonomy ... why not Overweenomy, Stupidonomy, maybe ... Lameonomy or Dumbonomy
or better yet ... Tesconomy ... The biggest the best and we sell underwear.
Leave a comment:
-
This is not a forum for sissies. I would suggest that the complainant look to a more patronising one for compliant posters? 🐂
Leave a comment:
-
They're certainly not very good sports.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyGreat way to build your brand, drop onto a contracting forum ask for feedback then complain when you don't like it.
Muppetry on a grand scale.
Leave a comment:
-
do you think they rent flats as well?Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyGreat way to build your brand, drop onto a contracting forum ask for feedback then complain when you don't like it.
Muppetry on a grand scale.
Leave a comment:
-
honestly..Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyGreat way to build your brand, drop onto a contracting forum ask for feedback then complain when you don't like it.
Muppetry on a grand scale.
this is like the stuff that drops through the letterbox
'we are great'
oh really ? then you dont mind getting stuffed into the bin then
Leave a comment:
-
grolsh!!!Originally posted by mudskipper View PostJeez, what have you been eating?
Leave a comment:
-
Are we allowed to point out the other areas of their website which still don't comply with the Companies Act? I can think of three or four, but I'm not an expert in such things like their design agency and whoever is responsible for their legal compliance.Originally posted by cojak View PostFollowing a complaint from Hireonomy, I have removed references to his company's website (which now have VAT and the parent company details entered).
I have kept the rude (as in disrespectful rather than porny) bits in however, because that's the way CUK rolls.
Leave a comment:
-
Are we not to mention areas where the websites are not compliant? Give us the word and it shall be so.Originally posted by cojak View PostFollowing a complaint from Hireonomy, I have removed references to his company's website (which now have VAT and the parent company details entered).
I have kept the rude (as in disrespectful rather than porny) bits in however, because that's the way CUK rolls.Last edited by speling bee; 27 May 2014, 19:52.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Today 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Yesterday 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Leave a comment: