Bananas for speling bee

[OwlHoot]

I wish he'd get rid of his bananas.

Overheard at clientCo a couple of weeks ago:

PM: What are all those dancing bananas on your screen?

Noob: errrr....

He knows he's on lots of people's ignore list for that very reason, the twat

You'd have thought Old Greg, oops sorry, spelling bee, would be a bit more mature

[BigTime]

He knows he's on lots of people's ignore list for that very reason, the twat

You'd have thought Old Greg, oops sorry, spelling bee, would be a bit more mature

Top tip. Thanks that never occurred to me. spelling bee

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

It seems cooler to throw them at him rather than give him a dancing one at the moment....

Ah but then he would pick it up and eat it - Dani Alves style.....

[d000hg]

He knows he's on lots of people's ignore list for that very reason, the twat

You'd have thought Old Greg, oops sorry, spelling bee, would be a bit more mature

If you are concerned your client will know you're on CUK perhaps you're the one with the maturity problem, vis a vis being a professional.

[d000hg]

Just for you:

[speling bee]

If you are concerned your client will know you're on CUK perhaps you're the one with the maturity problem, vis a vis being a professional.

I can confirm that I do in fact have a maturity problem.

[OwlHoot]

If you are concerned your client will know you're on CUK perhaps you're the one with the maturity problem, vis a vis being a professional.

This message is hidden because doohg is on your ignore list.

[NickFitz]

You can disable the display of sigs in your preferences. And avatars, if you wish.

[OwlHoot]

You can disable the display of sigs in your preferences. And avatars, if you wish.

True, but as a rule I like reading .sigs, and seeing avatars. (What I _don't_ like is those elaborate references to posts by people on my ignore list, which actually highlight all their posts! Why not just skip their posts?)

As far as I'm concerned if someone is inconsiderate enough to have a deliberately and pointlessly conspicuous .sig then the chances are they don't have much interesting to say.

[d000hg]

True, but as a rule I like reading .sigs, and seeing avatars. (What I _don't_ like is those elaborate references to posts by people on my ignore list, which actually highlight all their posts! Why not just skip their posts?)

As far as I'm concerned if someone is inconsiderate enough to have a deliberately and pointlessly conspicuous .sig then the chances are they don't have much interesting to say.

What about signatures referencing obscure posters from the past?