Is this acceptable?

[mudskipper]

Linky?

Or was it this PM business.

rep I think. I've seen worse!

[suityou01]

rep I think. I've seen worse!

Yep. I feel lucky enough with "that incident" that shall not be repeated.

Seems like a general clampdown on nastiness in "General". Not sure how I feel about that.

[MarillionFan]

Yep. I feel lucky enough with "that incident" that shall not be repeated.

Seems like a general clampdown on nastiness in "General". Not sure how I feel about that.

**** you, you syphilis riddled ****.

[suityou01]

**** you, you syphilis riddled ****.

Which is fine I think. But unless you were to put that in a PM or as a rep comment.

The CUK User guide may need updation.

[mudskipper]

Which is fine I think. But unless you were to put that in a PM or as a rep comment.

The CUK User guide may need updation.

Oooh, the temptation...

[NotAllThere]

Check the "Who's been banned and why sticky" you utter utter moron.

I was just going to say that.

Seems like a general clampdown on nastiness in "General". Not sure how I feel about that.

To an extent, but only when it's really nasty. Ribaldry and slagging off in a reasonably good humoured way is fine.

[eek]

Yep. I feel lucky enough with "that incident" that shall not be repeated.

Seems like a general clampdown on nastiness in "General". Not sure how I feel about that.

If we could ban grossly inaccurate avatars as well that would be a good win....

[suityou01]

If we could ban grossly inaccurate avatars as well that would be a good win....

You're as safe as houses then, you muppet

[suityou01]

Oooh, the temptation...

Woah, just checked my rep. Blimey you've a potty mouth.

[NotAllThere]

You're as safe as houses then, you muppet

But you're living dangerously. I'll see if I can fix that for you.