Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[NickFitz]

If you feel clever that you named your thread ‘Do not make posts concerning matters subject to court injunctions.’ instead of ‘Do not make posts or create threads concerning matters subject to court injunctions.’ ; and you look back now and feel not so clever -> Here’s one I don't have the time or the crayons to explain this to you.

A thread doesn't exist unless it has at least one post, so creating a thread involves making a post, by definition.

[FatLazyContractor]

A thread doesn't exist unless it has at least one post, so creating a thread involves making a post, by definition.

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

[WTFH]

A thread doesn't exist unless it has at least one post, so creating a thread involves making a post, by definition.

Except the button to create a new thread says "Create a New Thread"

[FatLazyContractor]

And oh by the way, the post for which I got banned still exists on page 2 including the thread.

[BrilloPad]

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

Are you going to quit whining?

You were told not to do something. You did it. End of.

I fondly remember when the mods banned norks being in bold and font size 7 - but it was fine in size 1. Churchill started at 1 then increased until he got banned!

[FatLazyContractor]

Are you going to quit whining?

You were told not to do something. You did it. End of.

I fondly remember when the mods banned norks being in bold and font size 7 - but it was fine in size 1. Churchill started at 1 then increased until he got banned!

Ok, got the point. Logic ceases here, I see

That said, @ NLUK =>

[NickFitz]

Except the button to create a new thread says "Create a New Thread"

"Create a New Thread by Making the Initial Post That Causes the Thread to Exist" was too long to fit on the button

[NickFitz]

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

Dunno. Maybe they were just saying that the injunction was stupid, rather than posting stuff designed to indicate who the subjects of the injunction are?

[northernladuk]

Im back, I learn my lesson and in order to make it up to you guys, I will let any good looking female mod sleep with me, but they have to supply the paper bag.

FTFY

[TestMangler]

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

Stop moaning you fat arestard and get back to your xhamster habit.