Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[GlenW]

Why did he ask for a ban then create an obvious sockie, who got banned PDQ?
Actually why does anyone create sockies?

[suityou01]

There have been cases of people deliberately contravening certain rules in order to be banned. By request is neater. But you'd better mean it.

Shurely shome mishtake?

[James Tiberius Kirk]

Actually why does anyone create sockies?

dunno

[NotAllThere]

Shurely shome mishtake?

You're right. I should have written:

There have been cases of people deliberately subverting the laws of probability affecting dice throws in order to be banned. By request is neater. But you'd better mean it.

[fullyautomatix]

Crap.

Who woke up the parrot?

:

Your sockies also have a very high post count

[SimonMac]

To save people looking can Cojak confirm if it was this

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post2073020

or this

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post2073038

[eek]

To save people looking can Cojak confirm if it was this

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post2073020

or this

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post2073038

Got to be the former. Calling someone a in general is no different from ing in tpd...

[DaveB]

Got to be the former. Calling someone a in general is no different from ing in tpd...

Although there was a degree of taunting of the Mods in the second post.

[eek]

Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

Although there was a degree of taunting of the Mods in the second post.

You aren't looking at the posters. Unix is hardly suity's favourite person.

I wouldn't call it taunting. The first post does however show a scary lack of sense / common decency

[Unix]

You aren't looking at the posters. Unix is hardly suity's favourite person.

I wouldn't call it taunting. The first post does however show a scary lack of sense / common decency

I think it was the post about MF, beyond the limits of taste.