To be fair, it's probably the Agencies payroll department doing your BACS payments for invoices.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agencies just don't get it do they
Collapse
X
-
-
Best not to risk it. No doubt GCHQ are watching the metadata relating to that email address and forwarding it straight to HMRC.Originally posted by GazCol View PostTo be fair, it's probably the Agencies payroll department doing your BACS payments for invoices.Comment
-
WGCS
Does it really matter that much? Yes I know agencies are clueless but there are worse things that they doIn Scooter we trust
Comment
-
So suggest to the agency that they create a new email address for you to submit them to, and a new department if necessary.Originally posted by Damon View PostPayroll!
Accounts Payable is what is should be IMO
Employees are on the payroll
Think you're reading way too much into this one.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.Comment
-
-
Essential equipment for pantswetters.Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
And may your bellend be adorned with the leaves of a thousand nettlesOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostEssential equipment for pantswetters.
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Maybe I should have posted it in Light Relief.
I am not suggesting this is a serious issue, just caught my eye as another example of how they expect us to rollover to their ill informed position of the legal agreements between our organisations that their 'payroll' relies upon.
What was more interesting was watching the thread develop and see the types of attitudes revealed
Comment
-
Which email do you send it from? Your personal one? Your clients one?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
It's an email address.Originally posted by Damon View PostMaybe I should have posted it in Light Relief.
I am not suggesting this is a serious issue, just caught my eye as another example of how they expect us to rollover to their ill informed position of the legal agreements between our organisations that their 'payroll' relies upon.
What was more interesting was watching the thread develop and see the types of attitudes revealed
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment