Sarah Palin critical of the Pope for not being enough of an extremist nutjob

[DirtyDog]

It's a pleasure educating you all. Google them, then get back to me.

[MyUserName]

That's because he combines his religious faith with an understanding of science, as some people manage to do; he believes lots of things, only some of which seem to the rest of us to be nonsense.

I guess that is true, he has the knack of compartmentalising that many religious people have. He also has a couple of rationalisations to protect some of the more absurd believes. He is also a better speller than I am.

Not that you would know of course as, apparently, you don't know anything!

[doodab]

It's a pleasure educating you all. Google them, then get back to me.

Well this is the problem, google doesn't come up with anything useful because there aren't any absolute laws of logic, only various people's opinions on the subject.

It seems you know very little about logic, or it's history. You certainly aren't very good at using it.

[russell]

It's a pleasure educating you all. Google them, then get back to me.

Well I have learnt that you are complete and utter moron. Thanks

[Mich the Tester]

Nothing wrong with Sarah Palin. Her opponents constant need to attack her demonstrates a fear, not because she is dangerous or to be feared by normal people but because the deviants and degenerates in society want to trash her reputation as they fear a strong principled leader with good traditional values putting the boot into the immorality they so enjoy partaking in.

I am actually quite disappointed by this thread. I was originally drawn to it by rumours of partaking in deviant immorality and then it degenerated into a discussion of ontology and epistemology. A return to CUK General standards please.


Here's Monica;

[cojak]

<saunters back to thread>

Well, well - it has gone quiet in here.

I guess you've all agreed to disagree.

[Mich the Tester]

<saunters back to thread>

Well, well - it has gone quiet in here.

I guess you've all agreed to disagree.

No, the troll's slumped off.

[DirtyDog]

<saunters back to thread>

Well, well - it has gone quiet in here.

I guess you've all agreed to disagree.

No, that last picture from Mitch means that we'll be back in five.....

[DirtyDog]

No, the troll's slumped off.

That's a logical conclusion.

[cojak]

He puts out opposite views to the mainstream, often with ideas so utterly bereft of any intelligent premise that even experienced forum moderators are conned into thinking he can't really be a troll.

Oh no, we know he's a troll all right, that's why I put a deadline on this thread. I didn't want to spoil the fight but it does get tedious after a while.

CUK would be a bit boring without the odd troll and nutter.


(Good post craig1, btw...)