Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Makes me mad, it really does
Collapse
X
-
-
So you want to trust the same courts system to send people to break rocks for the rest of their lives?Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostThat's a failure with the Courts system and Government guidelines for sentencing not a fault with the prison systemAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
But Lisa didn't do much more than primary school.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostHave you met anything above primary school here yet?Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
What else would you suggest? A system that allows individuals to assess and judge the actions of other individuals will always be flawed. Personally I think less interference from Government in sentencing would improve matters - freedom to apply common sense would, I'm sure, make many judges lives easier (although it would be likely to result in fewer news stories in the Daily Mail)Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostSo you want to trust the same courts system to send people to break rocks for the rest of their lives?Comment
-
Do you know, Sasguru, I find it incredibly humbling that someone such as yourself would take even the smallest interest in meOriginally posted by sasguru View PostBut Lisa didn't do much more than primary school.Comment
-
I don't think 'sense' is very common at all though.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostWhat else would you suggest? A system that allows individuals to assess and judge the actions of other individuals will always be flawed. Personally I think less interference from Government in sentencing would improve matters - freedom to apply common sense would, I'm sure, make many judges lives easier (although it would be likely to result in fewer news stories in the Daily Mail)And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
In that, you may have a pointOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think 'sense' is very common at all though.
But, again, what's the alternative? All men have a right to be judged by their peers and Judges are appointed to administer justice - all are human and therefore naturally flawed
Comment
-
yes it seems foolish to spend even more sending them to prison to get them to pay. I would of thought an order to deduct it from their benefits, pensions etc or enforcing bankruptcy would be cheaper?
obviously needs to be carefully managed.Comment
-
I am not sure reducing the benefits of a convicted murder would go very far towards assuaging the grief of the victims' families.Originally posted by vetran View Postyes it seems foolish to spend even more sending them to prison to get them to pay. I would of thought an order to deduct it from their benefits, pensions etc or enforcing bankruptcy would be cheaper?
obviously needs to be carefully managed.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

I am sure everyone on here is very sweet in their own little way

Comment