Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
what would the neighbours say?
Collapse
X
-
No, those stories are saying some of the people in the slums are illegal immigrants but generally 'people on low incomes', which includes illegal immigrants. You choose to focus on the illegal immigrants while I'm wondering how we've reached the state that people, quite aside from their immigration status, are once again living in slums in Britain and politicians just whinge about them not paying tax.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
my personal fix would be to make the government managed deposit system the key for both the Landlord and the tenant.
Landlords register and supply the relevant certificates (like the Insurance / MOT database). Tenants can only rent when they have a valid online ID. Both pay a ~ £30 annual fee for the pleasure. Any Landlord who bypasses the system can go to jail.
Rent & costs would be obvious so tax revenue could be identified.
Can also register property addresses so sub letting council houses would also be illegal and easy to punish.
Should take about a week to put together.Comment
-
Wouldn't moving them to Swindon would fall under the 'cruel and unusual punishment' provisions of UN treaties?Originally posted by darmstadt View PostIt'll be interesting to see what the council do next. Will they go around all 6000 sheds and investigate them? Will they be building a little camp for all the illegal immigrants while they're being checked out? Will they provide housing for those who aren't illegal? Will they all move to sheds in Swindon?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
James Bolt, the council's planning enforcement officer.
"Quite often you will get illegal immigrants – the reason being that these properties go unnoticed, and you are not going to complain about your conditions if you are here illegally."
yep, its really all people on housing benefit that have had the property inspected and the Landlords have supplied Safety certificates and the relevant insurance as every social landlord has to.
Its in slums because there is demand and the government /council have failed to act.
'Super Sheds' (block built non temporary buildings) have sprung up across Slough and the planning authority failed to act, now some are renting them illegally, their most likely clients are those that are not able to rent legally or get help with their rents, oh that's right its the illegals.Comment
-
Ah open plan and Eco friendly cooling. We will have to put the rent up.Originally posted by zeitghost
*There's nice big holes that keep them well ventilated instead.Comment
-
I can cope with all that. I went to boarding school in a damp, cold, drafty old building with knackered old hospital beds and floorboards that creaked every time Parsons-Ogilvy minor farted and a nasty smell of wee emanating from Fotheringhaugh major's top bunk. It's the 'Neath' bit that might put me off. Yes, before you ask, I've visited Neath.Originally posted by zeitghostGot a couple of old pigsties in Neath if anyone's looking for somewhere to kip for a while.
No windows or doors*, you can just about stand up in the one, but I'm afraid it's crouch down in the other.
Very reasonable rates.
<ZG in "Rising Damp? It's all flipping damp">
*There's nice big holes that keep them well ventilated instead.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
So Swindon is worse than Slough?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWouldn't moving them to Swindon would fall under the 'cruel and unusual punishment' provisions of UN treaties?
Comment
-
I'm with John Betjeman on the subject of Slough. Staines is arguably worse though, but at least it has an honest name to warn people off.Originally posted by vetran View PostSo Swindon is worse than Slough?
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
Swindon is fine if you understand the concept of roundabouts. I mean seriously
I am a daily spectator to people going zig zag on the magic roundabout.. feel for those poor blokes.I am Brad. I do more than the needful and drive the market rates up by not bobbing my head.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment