Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
what would the neighbours say?
Collapse
X
-
People who are living in illegal housing and not paying council tax are a significant burden on the state - look at the schooling in Slough (apart from that posh school nearby) and they typically have the same problem where there are too many children and not enough space. The LA can't fund more because they have no budget, and they have no budget because the people who expect to have access to the schools (and other state services) are not paying any council tax. -
there have been a number of stories over the last months detailing raids on 'shed to-lets' and the majority of the tenants were illegal, this is mainly because legal immigrants (who have access to housing benefits) and the poor are housed in the large amount of social housing provision in Slough. So yes they are relevant.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think there was any mention of illegal immigrants in the story, so I don't see how that's relevant. Secondly, yes, there are house oop north. Not an awful lot of jobs though. I'd like to see Slough working out how to provide decent affordable housing so people don't have to live in sheds.
These people are not receiving rent assistance etc they are mainly working cash in hand and paying someone cash in hand. It has nothing to do with the council providing affordable homes.
These landlords aren't social warriors doing their bit, they are cynical opportunists ripping off those weaker than them.
Would love to see more jobs created in the North, it seems the only logical way to cater for our populace as a whole.Comment
-
Comment
-
Do they have enough money to afford to pay the taxes?Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostPeople who are living in illegal housing and not paying council tax are a significant burden on the stateAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
How do you know that?Originally posted by vetran View PostThese people are not receiving rent assistance etc they are mainly working cash in hand and paying someone cash in hand. It has nothing to do with the council providing affordable homes.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I have friends who both use council housing services and who provide them.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostHow do you know that?
I read the papers & listen to the news who have covered the composition of the tenants.
Most illegals can't actually pay tax even if they want to, its sort of a limitation of their status.
Alternatively I could make it up as I go along like some do.Comment
-
Well, brilliantly (but perhaps not surprisingly), you've managed to introduce illegal immigrants to a discussion where they weren't even mentioned in the story. The story is about people living in sheds in a very rich developed western country, you've turned it into something about illegal immigrants, while the council repsond with just trying to take more tax money off those people. Meanwhile people are still living in sheds, no let's call them what they are; slums. Britain has a shanty town. I can't even be bothered about whether the people living in it are illegal immigrants, maybe some of them are, but what bothers me is the existence of a shanty town in Britain and a completely inadequate response from the council who can think no further than how to tax taxes off peple who probably can't afford to pay them anyway.Originally posted by vetran View PostI have friends who both use council housing services and who provide them.
I read the papers & listen to the news who have covered the composition of the tenants.
Most illegals can't actually pay tax even if they want to, its sort of a limitation of their status.
Alternatively I could make it up as I go along like some do.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
If they were in legal housing, then there are benefits which can be claimed to pay council tax etc. The benefit system then costs more, which is a central strain rather than a local one - it is impossible to provide local services for an increased population when you don't get the money from anywhere to provide those services.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostDo they have enough money to afford to pay the taxes?
Of course, getting into legal housing is a separate issue, since there isn't enough of that....Comment
-
Comment
-
A seperate issue, but sort of crucial in the whole story?Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostOf course, getting into legal housing is a separate issue, since there isn't enough of that....
Great system, get benefits to pay tax, pay tax to get benefits.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Comment