• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Women in Tech

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    I don't know any women who have sued for sexual harrassment, or even made a formal complaint about it.

    But if a woman is sexually harrassed, are you suggesting she should put up with it?
    I remember someone from Oracle UK making a formal sexual harassment claim. Reading the testimony afterwards was pretty cringeworthy.

    It was something like:

    Q: Do you think it's inappropriate to have a girly calendar on the wall of your office?
    Male Oracle exec accused of harassment: No more so than having a lingerie catalogue on my desk.

    Oracle lost.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
      "Put the kettle on, mate"
      "Yep, but you're a bloke"

      As with all things the context is the key, and that can never come across in examples on a forum board. I all all the male colleagues "Boss" and the female ones "Hun", mainly cause I am crap with names and they are permies so I don't really care to remember them. A few times someone has objected and I have adjusted it for future conversations with them. If they had gone to HR and made a formal complaint it would have been massive over reaction, a quite word usually solves most problems
      FWIW, I wouldn't feel particularly happy being called "Hun", but I wouldn't complain about it. I worked with a guy who called me (and all the other women) "my lovely" - we all thought it was cringeworthy and hated it, but none of us said anything.

      In doing that, you're setting yourself up for being complained about - maybe the complainee is oversensitive, but why take the risk? "Boss" and "Hun" have quite different connotations.

      (See MP's thread about being called "sweets".)

      Comment


        #93
        Interesting that we both went for "cringeworthy" (I hadn't read your post). That's exactly what most of it is.

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
          "Put the kettle on, mate"
          "Yep, but you're a bloke"

          As with all things the context is the key, and that can never come across in examples on a forum board. I all all the male colleagues "Boss" and the female ones "Hun", mainly cause I am crap with names and they are permies so I don't really care to remember them. A few times someone has objected and I have adjusted it for future conversations with them. If they had gone to HR and made a formal complaint it would have been massive over reaction, a quite word usually solves most problems
          I reckon you're probably on thin ice with this one. I just wouldn't bother with either where a simple Cheers or Ta would do. It easy to be informal without having to speak like Jamie Oliver.

          Comment


            #95
            "Get your tits out for the lads, ma'am" is surely much better than just plain 'get your tits out for the lads".
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              "Get your tits out for the lads, ma'am" is surely much better than just plain 'get your tits out for the lads".
              That's sexist. Some girls like tits too.

              "Get your tits out for the lads and dykes" would be far safer.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                That's sexist. Some girls like tits too.

                "Get your tits out for the lads and dykes" would be far safer.
                Indeed, much more inclusive; I stand corrected. Ma'am. How about now?
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #98
                  Daily sexism is rife, & in the majority I believe its “banter” & it’s easier to ignore it than make a comment & be labelled a trouble making feminist nutter.

                  The problem is, that it is slowly becomes part of the societal norm, which then leads on to comments “well she was wearing a low cut top so she was asking for it” in rape cases which IMHO says that we should treat all men as barely controlled potential rapists.

                  I don’t see myself as a feminist; I am just a girl in construction doing my job & getting on with it, a lead by example type of attitude. Fortunately it seems that a building site is more equal than most offices.

                  Although a co-worker was a bit taken aback when he commented that “his girl is getting to the age where she will need the talk about being safe” & I said I take it that you have had the talk with you boy about what is consent. His response basically said boys know better but girls need to be educated... that p1$$ed me off


                  Link

                  Link

                  Link
                  Growing old is mandatory
                  Growing up is optional

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                    That's sexist. Some girls like tits too.

                    "Get your tits out for the lads and dykes" would be far safer.
                    This is why I stick with just "Get your tits out". It is far more PC.
                    "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                    https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Halo Jones View Post
                      The problem is, that it is slowly becomes part of the societal norm, which then leads on to comments “well she was wearing a low cut top so she was asking for it” in rape cases which IMHO says that we should treat all men as barely controlled potential rapists.
                      You should be very wary of slippery slope arguments.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X