So you've pulled Nigella Lawson...

[NotAllThere]

What, with words? He isn't adult enough to respond with words? So that's how it is in SAS world is it? Get provoked, grab your wife by the throat?...

Does anyone else remember a novelty song in the charts in the 70s, that contained the line something like "I took her gently by t'throat, and I said 'tha great ugly wart'".?

Ah, here it is:

[shaunbhoy]

Does anyone else remember a novelty song in the charts in the 70s, that contained the line something like "I took her gently by t'throat, and I said 'tha great ugly wart'".?

Ah, here it is:

Brilliant! The first time I heard this I was in the Barber's having my hair cut. Had to stop for about 5 minutes as I was laughing so much!

[Old Hack]

What was my sig before then?

Re: the beating of women, you're the one who keeps mentioning it on this thread, like it's exciting you.
Psychologically that's like those superficially anti-gay men who have repressed their homosexuality.

But we all know you did sas, which is what makes your denials funnier.

Ah, so you're equating someone posting something all the time as to it physically being the opposite?

Interesting

You're so stupid sometimes sas, that it makes it too easy to dismiss you.

[sasguru]

But we all know you did sas, which is what makes your denials funnier..

Since you're the only one claiming this, I'm forced to conclude its a figment of your alcoholic imagination.
Or it should be quite straightforward for you to tell us what it used to be?
TBH I'm not surprised you think OH should be on the list of dunces - if you feel so strongly about the matter I'll make it so.

Ah, so you're equating someone posting something all the time as to it physically being the opposite?
.

Well, if someone posts something about, say, wife-beating all the time, you're forced to conclude that they're repressing something or at least find the idea interesting.
Either that or they're a monumental dullard of a bore who can't help repeating a boring idea ad nauseam.
There's not much room for any other interpretations.

Jeez, if I was making up a sockie I wouldn't make it as ridiculously cretinous as you on the grounds that it wouldn't be credible.

[Old Hack]

Since you're the only one claiming this, I'm forced to conclude its a figment of your alcoholic imagination.
Or it should be quite straightforward for you to tell us what it used to be?
TBH I'm not surprised you think OH should be on the list of dunces - if you feel so strongly about the matter I'll make it so.

Well, if someone posts something about, say, wife-beating all the time, you're forced to conclude that they're repressing something or at least find the idea interesting.
Either that or they're a monumental dullard of a bore who can't help repeating a boring idea ad nauseam.
There's not much room for any other interpretations.

Jeez, if I was making up a sockie I wouldn't make it as ridiculously cretinous as you on the grounds that it wouldn't be credible.

Didn't Old Greg claim it?

So if someone is posting about how rich and intelligent they are all the time, then it's a fair assumption to conclude they're lying or 'projecting'?

Interesting

If I were to make up a sockie, it wouldn't be as unbelievably stupid as you: someone who purports to be so intelligent, but in reality is often stupid enough to argue against his own points in his own posts

Thanks for that sas, for today, you really have given me a giggle.

[Old Hack]

I think we've found his OCD theme du jour. So easy and predictable
PS Thanks for featuring me in your signature, however misleading.
Obviously I get under your skin, eh?

So we have another ready example of sas's stupidity

[sasguru]

Didn't Old Greg claim it?
.

Yes. Obviously he thought you should have been on the list of dunces and was surprised you weren't.
Hence his error. Or maybe mine for not having you there in the first place.
Anyway I've fixed that particular issue.
Now off you toodle, you sad little man.

[Old Hack]

Yes. Obviously he thought you should have been on the list of dunces and was surprised you weren't.
Hence his error. Or maybe mine for not having you there in the first place.
Anyway I've fixed that particular issue.
Now off you toodle, you sad little man.

Oh, but I am there now? So I wasn't, and yet I was, now I am stupid, so am back on it, but all the time, you get under my skin, as you're on my sig, when I am on yours.

You're a confused soul aren't you sas

[sasguru]

So we have another ready example of sas's stupidity

So why have you deleted your sig? Did you realise it was showing up your obsessive mental stalking issues?

[Old Hack]

So why have you deleted your sig? Did you realise it was showing up your obsessive mental stalking issues?

But once again, your stupidity raises itself once more, in one comment.