Right to reside? keeping Johnny foreigner off our benefits or discriminatory?

[vetran]

Irrelevant bollux.
Not the sharpest tool are you? You'd do better with your time in learning some useful skills.
Until then back to the "Business analysis" some unfortunate co. is wasting money paying you to do

why irrelevant? of course you can't actually substantiate such arrogant assertions, you just throw out insults. Its like arguing with a 3 year old.

please explain why comparing working age benefit recipients with pension age benefit recipients makes any sense? They are a completely different set of recipients with different needs and requirements plus of course a completely different set of benefits.

[vetran]

Why should UK pay child tax credit and child benefit to an immigrant whose child is living abroad ?

For all immigrants benefits should be contributory based. Nothing else. I think this is the case in Germany and Dutch.

there now that is interesting, if Germany & Holland can do it why can't we?

[sasguru]

why irrelevant? of course you can't actually substantiate such arrogant assertions, you just throw out insults. Its like arguing with a 3 year old.

please explain why comparing working age benefit recipients with pension age benefit recipients makes any sense? They are a completely different set of recipients with different needs and requirements plus of course a completely different set of benefits.

Feck me, someone is really paying you to do "analysis"?
try to think it through logically, something you've signally failed to do in this thread.

[Mich the Tester]

For all immigrants benefits should be contributory based. Nothing else. I think this is the case in Germany and Dutch.

Yes, that's fair; therefore, a tax or NI reduction for immigrants wh can't claim non-contributory benefits?

[MyUserName]

Not bad for an IQ of 85

FTFY

[fullyautomatix]

Yes, that's fair; therefore, a tax or NI reduction for immigrants wh can't claim non-contributory benefits?

Why ?

[Mich the Tester]

please explain why comparing working age benefit recipients with pension age benefit recipients makes any sense? They are a completely different set of recipients with different needs and requirements plus of course a completely different set of benefits.

It perhaps doesn't make sense, but those benefits are paid from the same contributions. Perhaps that's the real problem in the UK and everywhere in Europe; we have universal benefits with universal payments where both benefit and contribution are insufficiently tailored to different situations.

[Old Hack]

Why ?

As they're paying into the system, but being refused access to it.

[Mich the Tester]

Why ?

Because they're paying for something from whose use thy are excluded.

[tomtomagain]

I
Basically, the natives are too lazy and unproductive.

HTH, BIKIW.

Nothing like an sweeping generalisation to rile people. Do you work for the DailyWail?