Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
... the demographic upon which UKIP relies for its votes is dying out.
I'm not so sure about that sas.
If you mean the middle-aged and the old, don't forget they are continually being replaced by the next generation, and UKIP's vote is going up not down.
Remember that there was once an alternative to the Labour party with the Social Democrats and many people voted for them as a protest vote but it didn't do too much good. They merged with the Liberals and look at them now. Maybe the Tories will decide to embrace the Ukip, much like the BNP have now done, and a new right wing party will be born, how about 'The National Conservatives?'
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in groups, thats how governments get elected
“The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.”
—Winston Churchill
Most voters are not stupid. However, they are overwhelmed by their own lives, often uneducated on public issues and misinformed by an increasingly biased and malevolent media. Hence, the substance that formed Churchill’s opinion.
The result is that elections are often determined at an emotional level, not factual discourse and reasoned analysis. In short, the real problem lies in the inability of the electorate to distinguish between true and false messaging, and fact and opinion.
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”
Most voters are not stupid. However, they are overwhelmed by their own lives, often uneducated on public issues and misinformed by an increasingly biased and malevolent media. Hence, the substance that formed Churchill’s opinion.
The result is that elections are often determined at an emotional level, not factual discourse and reasoned analysis. In short, the real problem lies in the inability of the electorate to distinguish between true and false messaging, and fact and opinion.
whs
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
elections are often determined at an emotional level, not factual discourse and reasoned analysis. In short, the real problem lies in the inability of the electorate to distinguish between true and false messaging, and fact and opinion.
If policy making were a simple matter of reasoned analysis then we would have no need of elections, or to determine the 'will of the people', we could just leave it to the civil servants to do the right thing. Elections are decided by appeal to the emotions of the voters because reasoned analysis and factual discourse alone cannot produce a definitive answer to most of the questions those running the country need to answer. Humans are emotional creatures, we can't expect society to function without accounting for that.
While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'
If policy making were a simple matter of reasoned analysis then we would have no need of elections, or to determine the 'will of the people', we could just leave it to the civil servants to do the right thing. Elections are decided by appeal to the emotions of the voters because reasoned analysis and factual discourse alone cannot produce a definitive answer to most of the questions those running the country need to answer. Humans are emotional creatures, we can't expect society to function without accounting for that.
I disagree. Policies are based not on a logical set of 'one size fits all' logic. Society as a whole is different. People's views are different. Elections are decided to appeal to the concept of individuality and that you have choice to vote for people who share your views. Society does not lead to a simple binary set of policies.
UKIP got good result and even if they can't get MPs with this more people look at them now and it will only be enough for many to believe they can upset ConLabLibs - Cameron can be counted on doing something really stupid, and Miliband is unlikely to do something smart.
UKIP can fook up in style though with some stupid comments that can totally ruin their chances. I'd bet on that.
Comment