• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66/S58 update

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
    All bollocks, like fat boy. No evidence at all he existed, but plenty that there was a man who wondered about making tulip out of wood...

    Fat boy, you not doing this ironing again are you, liek, following me about

    You couldn't be more stupid if you were Scottish.

    Oh, hang on.
    Errrr.. put down the crack pipe and call an ambulance.

    Comment


      Originally posted by proggy View Post
      Errrr.. put down the crack pipe and call an ambulance.
      Is that aimed at yourself? I thought it was drink that was making you act like this, but that would explain a lot, and you being a jock as well.

      Comment


        Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
        It's easier for a Camel to pass through the eye of a Needle than for a Rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
        That has nothing to do with politics, and everything to do with what you consider important in life.

        Two parables about money:

        Matthew 25:14-30 NIV - The Parable of the Bags of Gold - Bible Gateway
        Matthew 20:1-16 NIV - The Parable of the Workers in the - Bible Gateway
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          Originally posted by TalkingCheese View Post
          No, but take this scenario:
          1. programmer writes code with security hole
          2. during testing they find the bug and publicly debate it
          3. they decide not to fix it
          4. it is declassified as a bug and classed a feature
          5. it is publicised in the professional press and put in the user manual
          6. people make use of the feature
          7. some of them are written letters asking to explain their use of it but after explanation the use is further validated
          8. many others utilising the feature are ignored (even though they fully declared its use)
          9. 21 years later the project team decides to reclassify the feature as a bug
          10. the team mislead parliament (by declaring 1. and 6. above only, purposely ignoring the others and saying they always meant it to be a bug) persuading them to change the law retrospectively so that those who used the feature will owe an exceptional amount of money
          11. people lose their livelihoods/lives as a result

          ... slightly different picture.
          No, it's not a different picture - it's still Computer Misuse Act violation, people who did not close the bug might be incompetent idiots, but the person who'd take advantage of it to steal money would be doing time in jail (if found).

          Same principle should apply to tax laws.

          It's not like it's accidental action - BN66 and other schemes are all deliberately found and used loopholes in the system to gain financial advantage. It should be no more legal than doing the same to online banks.
          Last edited by AtW; 9 May 2013, 10:58.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
            Is that aimed at yourself? I thought it was drink that was making you act like this, but that would explain a lot, and you being a jock as well.
            I don't drink at work, and I am only 25% genetically Scottish.

            Comment


              Originally posted by proggy View Post
              I don't drink at work, and I am only 25% genetically Scottish.
              I'd keep that quiet, the 25% bit. If you blag enough, you could cover that up very easily.

              Comment


                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                That has nothing to do with politics, and everything to do with what you consider important in life.
                Jesus said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's " i.e. pay your taxes. He clearly saw it as a moral issue.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
                  Jesus said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's " i.e. pay your taxes. He clearly saw it as a moral issue.
                  Yeah and we do pay our taxes, otherwise we would all be locked up.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
                    Jesus said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's " i.e. pay your taxes. He clearly saw it as a moral issue.
                    He did not need to finish the phrase with - "OR else!"

                    Apparently the punishment dished out to tax evaders in ancient Rome was so horrible that no historian dared to write about it!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      He did not need to finish the phrase with - "OR else!"

                      Apparently the punishment dished out to tax evaders in ancient Rome was so horrible that no historian dared to write about it!
                      He also didn't say "also give to Caesar what might be his but its not clear and might change in the future"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X