• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Could you live on £7.50 a day?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Well, okay - I think it is a good idea, assuming the conditions are no worse than any other job.

    Unless you are ill, too old, too young or looking after someone then you should either work, do national sevice (not necessarily the armed forces but something) or be in full time education and achiving passing grades.

    If none of these apply then you will have work provided for you in order to receive benefits. Either in a workhouse or somewhere else - even if it is painting railings dark grey before the next person paints them light grey.
    Exactly my thoughts, but because of archaic anti-slavery laws they can't do this

    Comment


      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      Actually i'd suggest there are other factors to consider. Many people are invested in property and got in before the boom made it expensive. Anyone who didn't is considerably worse off. That is, to a large extent, down to luck of being born at the right time rather than hard work. To a lesser extent the same could be said about lucrative careers as IT contractors. I know I was lucky to be in the right place at the right time.
      That's very true. In my early career I reckoned that if I had been born three years earlier I could not only have gone straight from uni to a decent job but got onto the housing ladder when first time buys were exceptionally cheap.

      In 1979 I paid over twice the price for a 2 bed bungalow than my parents had paid for their 5 bed detached 10 years before.
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Now let's see, can anyone recommend a decent red for 7.49 a bottle?
        Our local Polish shop does 2 reds for a fiver. Handy for removing those stubborn stains.
        +50 Xeno Geek Points
        Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
        As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

        Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

        CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

        Comment


          You have to accept that there is a large amount of the population that just could not do any type of job safely and even the most basic work would require them to be constantly supervised, I'm not talking mentally handicapped but people just too stupid to do anything. You could be talking half a million.

          Comment


            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            Can you attach one to the Crank handles at the job centre?
            Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Zippy View Post
              Our local Polish shop does 2 reds for a fiver. Handy for removing those stubborn stains.
              Nope, that's too cheap for me. 7.40 minimum price, then I can save the pennies to buy a big sack of broken rice once a year. I only drink half decent wine, you know.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                Originally posted by Ketchup View Post
                Exactly my thoughts, but because of archaic anti-slavery laws they can't do this
                Really? Bugger
                "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Ketchup View Post
                  Exactly my thoughts, but because of archaic anti-slavery laws they can't do this
                  Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                  Really? Bugger
                  You're allowed to do that now, since the early 60s I think.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    You're allowed to do that now, since the early 60s I think.
                    Depends on whether what you are doing is covered by the slavery laws, I guess?
                    "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                    https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      You're allowed to do that now, since the early 60s I think.
                      I was wrong Link

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X