• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Wednesday puzzle

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    1965(!) How fookin old are you!!!!!!!!
    The question was recycled in my stats course 10 years ago.
    I think it's a classic because it shows probability isn't as intuitive as it seems.
    Am impressed with MyUserName - he's come very close, although (2) is slightly off.
    Hard Brexit now!
    #prayfornodeal

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      Nope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.
      Was looking at my old Stats papers.
      What a fun-packed life you lead.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        What a fun-packed life you lead.
        Well I'm at home getting paid fook loads to do diddly squat.
        So compared to you, you're right.
        Hard Brexit now!
        #prayfornodeal

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          Well I'm at home getting paid fook loads to do diddly squat.
          So compared to you, you're right.
          Yeah, there's a big market out there for highly paid, work at home, read old school papers and post on the internet experts.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
            Yeah, there's a big market out there for highly paid, work at home, read old school papers and post on the internet experts.

            It's a shame you're so limited, otherwise you would know that it's true.
            Tick tock tick tock, feeling my bank balance rise as I post this. Nice feeling
            Hard Brexit now!
            #prayfornodeal

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by sasguru View Post
              Am impressed with MyUserName
              That is not something I here very often!!!

              Originally posted by sasguru View Post
              although (2) is slightly off.
              Hmmm - let me look again

              2 people out of 3 share a birthday:

              I thought it was 3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365

              2 out of 3 share a birthday would be 1/365 + 1/365 as the first person could either be the same as the second or third.

              Oooh I think I get it.

              The first person could be the same as the second or third - 2/365
              The second could be the same as the third 1/365

              Hence would it be 1/365 + 2/365 = 3/365?
              "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

              https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

              Comment


                #27
                Probably wrong...

                All 3) 1/365^2
                2) (364+364)/365^2
                None) 364*363/365^2

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                  That is not something I here very often!!!



                  Hmmm - let me look again

                  2 people out of 3 share a birthday:

                  I thought it was 3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365

                  2 out of 3 share a birthday would be 1/365 + 1/365 as the first person could either be the same as the second or third.

                  Oooh I think I get it.

                  The first person could be the same as the second or third - 2/365
                  The second could be the same as the third 1/365

                  Hence would it be 1/365 + 2/365 = 3/365?
                  What about leap years?
                  What happens in General, stays in General.
                  You know what they say about assumptions!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    Along the right lines .....
                    In fact no (3) is spot on. As is no (1). Apologies.
                    2 is quite hard but if you have 1 and 3 you should be able to do it
                    That's embarrassing (for you)

                    At 11:03 you thought the answer was wrong
                    At 11:10 you realised the answer was correct.

                    Show some consistency Muppet and actually read and think before trying to look clever.
                    merely at clientco for the entertainment

                    Comment


                      #30
                      1 - (364/365 * 363/365) = Probability of at least 2 of them having same birthday

                      1 - (364/365 * 363/365) - (1/365 * 1/365) = Probability that exactly 2 have same birthday

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X