Is the answer 7?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Wednesday puzzle
Collapse
X
-
-
I am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:Originally posted by sasguru View Post3 men meet by chance. What are the probabilities that:
(1) None of them share a birthday
(2) 2 of them share a birthday
(3) All 3 share a birthday
Show yer logic.
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?Comment
-
Birthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDIComment
-
-
A clue to the puzzle
These rules are all you need:
P(A and B and ...) = P(A) x P(B)... (if A and B and ... are independent)
P(A or B or ...) = P(A) + P(B) ... (if A and B and ... are mutually exclusive)Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Along the right lines .....Originally posted by MyUserName View PostI am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?
In fact no (3) is spot on. As is no (1). Apologies.
2 is quite hard but if you have 1 and 3 you should be able to do itLast edited by sasguru; 30 January 2013, 11:10.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
You really are thick as 20 planks put together aren't you?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBirthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDI

BTW we have a cleaner.
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Presumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.Originally posted by sasguru View PostI can hear the noise of frantic googling


Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Nope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.Originally posted by d000hg View PostPresumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.
Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...
Was looking at my old Stats papers.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
1965(!) How fookin old are you!!!!!!!!Originally posted by sasguru View PostNope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.
Was looking at my old Stats papers.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Today 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Yesterday 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46

Comment