Is the answer 7?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Wednesday puzzle
Collapse
X
-
-
I am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:Originally posted by sasguru View Post3 men meet by chance. What are the probabilities that:
(1) None of them share a birthday
(2) 2 of them share a birthday
(3) All 3 share a birthday
Show yer logic.
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?Comment
-
Birthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDIComment
-
-
A clue to the puzzle
These rules are all you need:
P(A and B and ...) = P(A) x P(B)... (if A and B and ... are independent)
P(A or B or ...) = P(A) + P(B) ... (if A and B and ... are mutually exclusive)Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Along the right lines .....Originally posted by MyUserName View PostI am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?
In fact no (3) is spot on. As is no (1). Apologies.
2 is quite hard but if you have 1 and 3 you should be able to do itLast edited by sasguru; 30 January 2013, 11:10.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
You really are thick as 20 planks put together aren't you?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBirthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDI

BTW we have a cleaner.
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Presumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.Originally posted by sasguru View PostI can hear the noise of frantic googling


Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Nope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.Originally posted by d000hg View PostPresumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.
Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...
Was looking at my old Stats papers.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
1965(!) How fookin old are you!!!!!!!!Originally posted by sasguru View PostNope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.
Was looking at my old Stats papers.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment