Is the answer 7?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Wednesday puzzle
Collapse
X
-
-
I am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:Originally posted by sasguru View Post3 men meet by chance. What are the probabilities that:
(1) None of them share a birthday
(2) 2 of them share a birthday
(3) All 3 share a birthday
Show yer logic.
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?Comment
-
Birthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDIComment
-
-
A clue to the puzzle
These rules are all you need:
P(A and B and ...) = P(A) x P(B)... (if A and B and ... are independent)
P(A or B or ...) = P(A) + P(B) ... (if A and B and ... are mutually exclusive)Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Along the right lines .....Originally posted by MyUserName View PostI am rubbish at this sort of thing but I will have a go:
None share a birthday:
364/365 * 363/365
Logic being that someone has to have a birthday which is not the same as the first. Hence only 364 days are available, the other guy cannot have the same birthday as the other two hence only 363 days are available.
2 people out of 3 share a birthday:
1/365 + 1/365
Either the first guy has the same day as the first or the other guy has the. This could happen 3 different times as there are 3 ways of pairing the 3 together:
3 x (1/365 + 1/365) = 6/365
All 3 share a birthday:
1/365 * 1/365
As the first person's birthday does not matter but the other two must be on the same day
Is this vaguely correct?
In fact no (3) is spot on. As is no (1). Apologies.
2 is quite hard but if you have 1 and 3 you should be able to do itLast edited by sasguru; 30 January 2013, 11:10.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
You really are thick as 20 planks put together aren't you?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBirthdays are not uniformly distributed throughout the year, so whatever childish maths you are going to come out with shows your stupidity for solving real world problems.
Hence why your biggest challenge this week will be cleaning the oven for your wife.
HTH BIDI

BTW we have a cleaner.
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Presumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.Originally posted by sasguru View PostI can hear the noise of frantic googling


Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Nope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.Originally posted by d000hg View PostPresumably that's where you got the question from in the first place.
Some of us have non-imaginary (if you'll excuse the maths pun) work to do...
Was looking at my old Stats papers.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
1965(!) How fookin old are you!!!!!!!!Originally posted by sasguru View PostNope. It was actually a question on the PPE exam for Hilary College, Oxford, 1965.
Was looking at my old Stats papers.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Today 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Yesterday 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12

Comment