Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So to summarise several pages of crud: some cretins don't understand the concept of the rule of law - in the absence of a statute of limitations, if evidence emerges of law-breaking at any time, it is the responsibilty of the relevant authorities to prosecute for the alleged crime, should they (the CPS) judge the evidence is of sufficient quality.
I don't know why such a simple concept, common to every civilised country, should cause realms of complete garbage to be posted.
I have to tread lightly here as rape is not a subject I would wish to be flippant about; indeed it is a heinous act.
Now, rape to me connotates gaining carnal knowledge of a lady without her consent and against her will. It also implies a degree of violence.
The legal definition has become a bit more blurred in recent times with these so called date rape cases. I believe there have been cases where people have gone to court where the woman was too sozzled to remember much about the event (even if she did give drunken consent). Not sure if any of these prosecutions were successful but I do believe the legal definition has been watered down and It's possible that Mr Roach is being accused by a partner in some drunken romp many years ago as opposed to his being involved in some vicious assault as the word rape leads one to believe.
I have to tread lightly here as rape is not a subject I would wish to be flippant about; indeed it is a heinous act.
Now, rape to me connotates gaining carnal knowledge of a lady without her consent and against her will. It also implies a degree of violence.
The legal definition has become a bit more blurred in recent times with these so called date rape cases. I believe there have been cases where people have gone to court where the woman was too sozzled to remember much about the event (even if she did give drunken consent). Not sure if any of these prosecutions were successful but I do believe the legal definition has been watered down and It's possible that Mr Roach is being accused by a partner in some drunken romp many years ago as opposed to his being involved in some vicious assault as the word rape leads one to believe.
Comment