- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Could have a black James Bond next....
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
If it was just any old secret agent but surely the essential point is that he is an iconic character where people have established perceptions. If we had a new Tom and Gerry where Gerry was a rabbit, people who remembered the original would be saying "That's not Tom and Gerry!" and they probably wouldn't watch it. Are they racist against rabbits? No, it's just that people have fond memories and associations and we shouldn't just treat them with distain, it creates resentment.But with Bond, all we really know about the character is that it's an MI6 agent
Society for most is whatever they grew up with. Trying to change it far too quickly by trampling roughshod over people's values and views is counter productive. Better to go slowly, in the end it works much better.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Yep yep, but as you say, he is an iconic character; for me the 'character' aspect is more important than the colour of the bloke. There are plenty of black men that we would consider to be gentlemen, just as we've all met some we wouldn't see that way. I really think some people are getting hung up on something that's not really central to the character.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostIf it was just any old secret agent but surely the essential point is that he is an iconic character where people have established perceptions. If we had a new Tom and Gerry where Gerry was a rabbit, people who remembered the original would be saying "That's not Tom and Gerry!" and they probably wouldn't watch it. Are they racist against rabbits? No, it's just that people have fond memories and associations and we shouldn't just treat them with distain, it creates resentment.
Society for most is whatever they grew up with. Trying to change it far too quickly by trampling roughshod over people's values and views is counter productive. Better to go slowly, in the end it works much better.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Every blokes favourite Bond, Connery, last did an official film over 40 years ago. Moore's last raised eyebrow was in 85. The cinema going audience is not who it originally was. I'd hazard that most who are watching in the cinema now won't remember past Brosnan. The target audience has changed hence the chavving up.Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostEvery blokes favourite Bond, Connery, last did an official film over 40 years ago. Moore's last raised eyebrow was in 85. The cinema going audience is not who it originally was. I'd hazard that most who are watching in the cinema now won't remember past Brosnan. The target audience has changed hence the chavving up.
No chav Bond. Anything but chav. That fellow Idris Elba does not appear to me to be a chav, and none of the black people I know could be classed as 'chavs'. But maybe that's because I don't associate with chavs, so I don't meet any white chavs or any black chavs.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Dont be silly, everyone remembers them all as the films were always on the tv. The current one is my favourite as he seems more gritty and believable.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostEvery blokes favourite Bond, Connery, last did an official film over 40 years ago. Moore's last raised eyebrow was in 85. The cinema going audience is not who it originally was. I'd hazard that most who are watching in the cinema now won't remember past Brosnan. The target audience has changed hence the chavving up.Comment
-
Agreed.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
No chav Bond. Anything but chav. That fellow Idris Elba does not appear to me to be a chav, and none of the black people I know could be classed as 'chavs'. But maybe that's because I don't associate with chavs, so I don't meet any white chavs or any black chavs.
Before it was Astons & Omega watches... then BMW... then Sony... now Heineken. what next? Superdry? Bench?
Comment
-
I remember David Niven. How come when people go on about Bond they never mention him?won't remember past Brosnanbloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Showing your age there.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostI remember David Niven. How come when people go on about Bond they never mention him?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
this depends if we are led to believe that the james bond we see now is (in fictional terms) the same James Bond who appeared in the first films then he cannot be black as people do not simply change from white to black or vice versa(No michael jackson jokes please).
However if James Bond is just psuedanym (sp?) for the agent whose code name is 007 then the colour of the skin matters not..Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment