• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Good time to bug your MP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    If you're so desperate for figures there is actually an app where you can enter in your postcode, your house area and how much tax you want it to raise and you can indeed find out how much tax your house would be due.

    Mark Wadsworth: Design your own LVT system
    That's brilliant; you should send that to George Osborne. I'm sure he'll be grateful.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      I don't know - I like the current system.
      I've got 2 paid-off properties and am a member of the rentier class.
      There have always been people throughout history who would change that but they never have and never will.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        I don't know - I like the current system.
        I've got 2 paid-off properties and am a member of the rentier class.
        There have always been people throughout history who would change that but they never have and never will.
        So you don't like the chance to earn a quick buck from buying my farmland and selling it back to me for one pound more? Or make it four pounds more; that might get you a pint in London.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          Oh well, i will retire in the knowledge that you're either too thick to understand the benefits or you secretly know it's a good idea and you're too ashamed to admit it.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Robinho View Post
            Oh well, i will retire in the knowledge that you're either too thick to understand the benefits or you secretly know it's a good idea and you're too ashamed to admit it.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              Originally posted by Robinho View Post
              I would personally suggest all of it, or 95% at least if you want to keep tax on cigs and beer or something.

              The intent would be for it to replace tax on productive activity like income, vat, corp tax etc.
              100%?

              So the oil and gas would be given away?
              The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

              George Frederic Watts

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

              Comment


                Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                100%?

                So the oil and gas would be given away?
                You could add oil/carbon taxes as well if you like, as i said, getting rid of taxes on productivity are the most important taxes too lose.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                  You could add oil/carbon taxes as well if you like, as i said, getting rid of taxes on productivity are the most important taxes too lose.
                  But what would you like? It was 100%. Do you want royalties on oil and gas extraction? Anything else?
                  The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                  George Frederic Watts

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                    But what would you like? It was 100%. Do you want royalties on oil and gas extraction? Anything else?
                    Well if the oil was land based then the value of that land would be worth quite a bit, and a lot of tax would be levied. You could apply the same principal to the sea bed in UK economic waters.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                      Oh well, i will retire poor in the knowledge that you're either too thick to understand the benefits or you secretly know it's a good idea and you're too ashamed to admit it.
                      ftfy
                      Hard Brexit now!
                      #prayfornodeal

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X