• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Good time to bug your MP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #id
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Well if the oil was land based then the value of that land would be worth quite a bit, and a lot of tax would be levied. You could apply the same principal to the sea bed in UK economic waters.
    I am talking about royalties related to extraction rights, not ownership. The continental shelf is not owned.

    So what % of state income will the land tax cover?
    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

    George Frederic Watts

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

    Comment


      #id
      "Owned" is to be considered the equivalent to "being granted extraction rights" in this situation.

      Comment


        #id
        Originally posted by Robinho View Post
        "Owned" is to be considered the equivalent to "being granted extraction rights" in this situation.
        So it's a land and mineral extraction rights tax. Fair enough. Does that cover 100% of state income?
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment


          #id
          Ummm, hang on. Oil is under the ground. The earth is round. I could dig a hole and find oil. My neighbour could dig a hole and find oil too, but it's in the same oilfield. Do we now have a race to extract as much as possible?

          Is this another issue for the 'Transitional Problems' list?
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #id
            There's no reason why it couldn't though i'm personally in favour of cutting the budget by at least 50% anyway, but that's a separate argument.

            Comment


              #id
              ..

              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Ummm, hang on. Oil is under the ground. The earth is round. I could dig a hole and find oil. My neighbour could dig a hole and find oil too, but it's in the same oilfield. Do we now have a race to extract as much as possible?

              Is this another issue for the 'Transitional Problems' list?
              No, you would both pay double the tax. Win/win or in your case lose/lose.

              Comment


                #id
                Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                There's no reason why it couldn't though i'm personally in favour of cutting the budget by at least 50% anyway, but that's a separate argument.
                Not could but should.

                Will your land and mineral extraction tax cover 100% of state income?
                The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                George Frederic Watts

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                Comment


                  #id
                  Originally posted by tractor View Post
                  No, you would both pay double the tax. Win/win or in your case lose/lose.
                  No, win/win, because of the little land exchange deal. License to print money, as I told you.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #id
                    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                    Not could but should.

                    Will your land and mineral extraction tax cover 100% of state income?
                    Yes it should be able to.

                    Comment


                      #id
                      Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                      Yes it should be able to.
                      Not should be able to. Should it? Is that your policy? Land and mineral extraction to meet 100% of state income?
                      The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                      George Frederic Watts

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X