• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Good time to bug your MP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Well if the oil was land based then the value of that land would be worth quite a bit, and a lot of tax would be levied. You could apply the same principal to the sea bed in UK economic waters.
    I am talking about royalties related to extraction rights, not ownership. The continental shelf is not owned.

    So what % of state income will the land tax cover?
    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

    George Frederic Watts

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

    Comment


      "Owned" is to be considered the equivalent to "being granted extraction rights" in this situation.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Robinho View Post
        "Owned" is to be considered the equivalent to "being granted extraction rights" in this situation.
        So it's a land and mineral extraction rights tax. Fair enough. Does that cover 100% of state income?
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment


          Ummm, hang on. Oil is under the ground. The earth is round. I could dig a hole and find oil. My neighbour could dig a hole and find oil too, but it's in the same oilfield. Do we now have a race to extract as much as possible?

          Is this another issue for the 'Transitional Problems' list?
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            There's no reason why it couldn't though i'm personally in favour of cutting the budget by at least 50% anyway, but that's a separate argument.

            Comment


              ..

              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Ummm, hang on. Oil is under the ground. The earth is round. I could dig a hole and find oil. My neighbour could dig a hole and find oil too, but it's in the same oilfield. Do we now have a race to extract as much as possible?

              Is this another issue for the 'Transitional Problems' list?
              No, you would both pay double the tax. Win/win or in your case lose/lose.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                There's no reason why it couldn't though i'm personally in favour of cutting the budget by at least 50% anyway, but that's a separate argument.
                Not could but should.

                Will your land and mineral extraction tax cover 100% of state income?
                The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                George Frederic Watts

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                Comment


                  Originally posted by tractor View Post
                  No, you would both pay double the tax. Win/win or in your case lose/lose.
                  No, win/win, because of the little land exchange deal. License to print money, as I told you.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                    Not could but should.

                    Will your land and mineral extraction tax cover 100% of state income?
                    Yes it should be able to.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                      Yes it should be able to.
                      Not should be able to. Should it? Is that your policy? Land and mineral extraction to meet 100% of state income?
                      The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                      George Frederic Watts

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X