Which is worse - Islam or Wonga?

[doodab]

...and into something even worse.

You think they'll become recruitment consultants?

[Troll]

We had better legalise drugs

Agreed

Presumably then you are OK with suppliers rushing to create ever more potent versions of their products i.e. a more psychotic version of skunk; and bringing to bear a fully legal and now industrialised manufacturing / distribution network to ensure maximum market share - would adverts on the local TV / Radio be OK?

Given the problems with trying to prevent kids taking up smoking what if any checks would you put in place to prevent the little mites getting hold of a (now) legally allowed substances?

[Bunk]

a more psychotic version of skank;

[Troll]

oops ... my druggie days are long gone

[Bunk]

oops ... my druggie days are long gone

I wasn't sure if you were talking about drugs or prostitution

[Mich the Tester]

Given the problems with trying to prevent kids taking up smoking what if any checks would you put in place to prevent the little mites getting hold of a (now) legally allowed substances?

Kids buying addictive substances is a voluntary transaction with mutual benefit to both parties. Why would you want to interfere in that?

[sasguru]

Kids buying addictive substances is a voluntary transaction with mutual benefit to both parties. Why would you want to interfere in that?

That's OK they can always choose to stop after they're addicted.

[Robinho]

That's OK they can always choose to stop after they're addicted.

Yes, if you are addicted to something it's impossible to give up and you have to use that substance until you die. This is why nobody in the history of time has ever given up smoking or alcohol.

[SueEllen]

Yes, if you are addicted to something it's impossible to give up and you have to use that substance until you die. This is why nobody in the history of time has ever given up smoking or alcohol.

Rob while you may be an economist you really have no grasp of life sciences or history.

If you had you wouldn't be advocating substances that has been known to cause human suffering including substances that people can get physically addicted to.

[SupremeSpod]

Rob while you may be an economist you really have no grasp of life sciences or history.

If you had you wouldn't be advocating substances that has been known to cause human suffering including substances that people can get physically addicted to.

Oi! Woman, kettle!