I don't see a problem in the first place.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
EU politicians propose to dissolve any company with <40% female board members
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Robinho View PostI don't see a problem in the first place.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostSounds like the way lots of corporations are run. Top down process control and Taylorism are just the right's version of communist central planning.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Robinho View PostI don't see a problem in the first place.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou're a white straight man, why would you?Comment
-
If someone wants to discriminate that's their own dumb choice. They won't get far in life choosing employees etc on gender/ethnicity vs merit.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe key difference is that workers, suppliers and customers have choices about how they are run whether to work with them or whether to supply to them.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI have a blacklist of 3 organisations that
he said the B word stone the hereticComment
-
There's nothing necessarily wrong with a oligopoly or even a monopoly for me. If a company profiteers then that will simply attract competition, provided there are actually wealthy investors about that haven't been taxed to death.
A lot of monopolies arise from crony capitalism or ridiculous patent laws anyway.Last edited by Robinho; 14 September 2012, 14:37.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI never said that women are being held back, I am saying that that they generally cope with juggling careers and children and that they take ultimate responsibility (mostly) for their kids and their home. Being a fully active executive director of a large company is probably a step too far for many women (except HR - which lets face it is not a key role requiring 120% of commitment) which is why they choose not to chase these jobs.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Today 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
Comment